How to Make Direct Product of Representations for the Lorentz Group?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the direct product of representations for the Lorentz group, specifically focusing on the representations (1/2,0) and (0,1/2) and their relationship to the Dirac representation (1/2,1/2). The original poster expresses confusion regarding the process of forming these products and seeks clarification on the underlying principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the direct product of representations and questions whether the process is similar to that of SU(n). They provide specific examples of representations and seek to understand how to demonstrate the relationship between them. Other participants inquire about the original poster's progress in understanding the tensor product of the representations.

Discussion Status

The discussion has seen some progress, with the original poster indicating they have figured out part of the problem related to complexification for sl(2,C). However, there remains a focus on clarifying the specific relationship between the representations (1/2,0) and (0,1/2) and how they combine to yield (1/2,1/2). Multiple interpretations of the mathematical relationships are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of representation theory and the specific properties of the Lorentz group, with some assumptions about the knowledge of complexification and isomorphisms being discussed. There is an acknowledgment of the limitations in the original material referenced by the original poster.

Marco_84
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Lorentz Representations

I am reading about the Lorentz group on Schweber.
My problem is the following:
I don't really understand how to make the direct product of Representations for this Group.
I know that we need only 2 mubers since the invarints of the gropu are 2.
I know the general reciepie for the SU(n) case is it the same?

Let me ask an example explicity: I've read that Weyl is (1/2,0) Repr and its conjugate is obviously (0,1/2) left handed and right handed; while Dirac is (1/2,1/2).
How can i show that (1/2,0)x(0,1/2)=(1/2,1/2).

The book doesn't go so deep. i think i have to read somewhere else.

thanks in advance
marco
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[Never mind I've figured out by myself, it wws just necessary how works complexification for sl(2,C)..

marco
 
Did you figure out how (1/2,0) \otimes (0,1/2) =(1/2,1/2) ?
 
bigubau said:
Did you figure out how (1/2,0) \otimes (0,1/2) =(1/2,1/2) ?

yeah it is something like this:
(j1,j1')x(j2,j2')=Sum all possible combination of( j,j'). where

j=j1+j2,j1+j2-1,...,|j1-j2|.
j'=j1'+j2',j1'+j2'-1,...,|j1'-j2'|.

because after complexification you have that so(1,3) is isomorphic to su(2)xsu(2)...

bye bye
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K