Understanding 4-Vector Representations in the Lorentz Group

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the nature of irreducible representations (IR) within the proper orthochronous Lorentz group, specifically focusing on the 4-vector representation labeled as ##D^{(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})}##. It is established that ##D^{(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})}## is not an irreducible representation, as it can be decomposed into two irreducible components: ##D^{(\frac{1}{2}, 0)}## and ##D^{(0,\frac{1}{2})##. The discussion also confirms that while the vector representation of the Lorentz group is irreducible, the spinor representation is reducible into two smaller irreducible representations. Additionally, the representations ##D^{(3/2,0)}## and ##D^{(0,3/2)}## are confirmed to be irreducible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, particularly representation theory
  • Familiarity with the Lorentz group and its properties
  • Knowledge of irreducible representations and their significance
  • Basic understanding of the special linear group SL(2,C)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Lorentz group and its representations in detail
  • Learn about the decomposition of representations in group theory
  • Explore the implications of irreducibility in quantum mechanics and particle physics
  • Investigate the relationship between SL(2,C) and the Lorentz group representations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, mathematicians specializing in group theory, and students studying quantum mechanics or particle physics, particularly those interested in the mathematical foundations of relativistic representations.

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I am reading some notes on Lorentz group and at a point it is said that the irreducible representations (IR) of the proper orthochronous Lorentz group are labeled by 2 numbers (as it has rank 2). They describe the 4-vector representation ##D^{(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})}## and initially I thought this is an IR (also being a fundamental representation). However, further on they say that ##D^{(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})} = D^{(\frac{1}{2}, 0)} \oplus D^{(0,\frac{1}{2})}##, which implies that ##D^{(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})}## is not an IR. So I am confused, is it or is it not IR? The way I was thinking about it, is that the 4 dimensional vector representation (i.e. under Lorentz group) is an IR while the 4 dim spinor representation (i.e. under ##SL(2,C)##) is not IR. But wouldn't you need different notations for them? Then, ##D^{(0,\frac{3}{2})}## and ##D^{(\frac{3}{2},0)}## are also 4 dimensional, so what should I do with them? Are they IR, too? Can someone clarify this for me? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first part, I will show that if a representation of a product group is constructed from an irreducible representation for each of the groups in it, than that representation is also irreducible.

For irreducibility: for a representation D(a) of a group, if a matrix X satisfies D(a).X = X.D(a), then X must be a multiple of the identity matrix.

For a group G that is a product G1 * G2, its elements are a = (a1,a2) where a1 ranges over all of G1 and a2 does so for G2. A representation D(a) = D1(a1)*D2(a2) where D1 is a rep of G1 and D2 of G2. In component form,

D(a)(i1j1,i2j2) = D1(a1)(i1,j1) * D2(a2)(i2,j2)

To test reducibility, we must find the possible matrices X(i1j1,i2j2) that satisfy D(a)(i1j1,i2j2) * X(j1k1,j2k2) = X(i1j1,i2j2) * D(a)(j1k1,j2k2) over all values of i1,i2,k1,k2 and summed over dummy indices j1,j2. Using the above decomposition of D(a) gives us

D1(a1)(i1,j1) * D2(a2)(i2,j2) * X(j1j2,k1k2) = X(i1i2,j1j2) * D1(a1)(j1,k1) * D2(a2)(j2,k2)

Setting a2 to the identity of G2 gives us D1(a1)(i1,j1) * X(j1i2,k1k2) = X(i1i2,j1k2) * D1(a1)(j1,k1) and since D1 is irreducible,

X(i1i2,j1j2) = δ(i1,j1) * X(i2,j2)

This in turn reduces the equation to D2(a2)(i2,j2) * X(j2,k2) = X(i2,j2) * D2(j2,k2) and that in turn gives us

X(i1i2,j1j2) = δ(i1,j1) * δ(i2,j2) * X

A multiple of the identity matrix. Thus, if component-group reps D1 and D2 are irreducible, then the product-group irrep D = D1 * D2 is also irreducible.

Thus, for the Lorentz group, every representation with form (j1,j2) is irreducible, since each part is irreducible.
 
In general, a product representation of two irreducible representations will be reducible, but if one of the irreps is the unit representation D(a) = 1, then the product will also be an irrep. Thus, (j1,j2) = (j1,0) * (0,j2) where 0 is the unit representation.

The vector rep of the Lorentz group is (1/2,1/2), and is thus irreducible.

The spinor rep is (1/2,0) + (0,1/2) and is thus reducible to two smaller spinors, (1/2,0) and (0,1/2), both irreducible. Each one of them is a rep of SL(2,C), but each one is the complex conjugate of the other.

The reps (3/2,0) and (0,3/2) are both irreducible.

Though all of (1/2,1/2), (1/2,0) + (0,1/2), (3/2,0), and (0,3/2) have size 4, they are all inequivalent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
989
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K