A continuous function in Hausdorff space

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in topology concerning the extension of a continuous function defined on a subset of a space to its closure in a Hausdorff space. The original poster seeks to understand the uniqueness of such an extension.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of continuity and Hausdorff properties, questioning how these relate to the uniqueness of the extension of the function. There are discussions about the definitions of continuity, Hausdorff spaces, and the concept of unique determination of functions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of the problem, suggesting that the uniqueness of the extension can be shown by assuming two extensions and deriving a contradiction. Others express enjoyment in the problem-solving process and share their reasoning attempts.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on understanding definitions and properties relevant to the problem, such as continuity, Hausdorffness, and the concept of limit points. Participants note the importance of these concepts in approaching the problem.

Symmetryholic
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let A \subset X; let f : A \rightarrow Y be continuous; let Y be Hausdorff. Show that if f may be extended to a continuous function g: \overline{A} \rightarrow Y, then g is uniquely determined by f.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



If f is a homeomorphism, we can say A is a Hausdorff space.
Just given a continuous function f, I am clueless how to start this problem.
Any advice will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Symmetryholic said:

Homework Statement



Let A \subset X; let f : A \rightarrow Y be continuous; let Y be Hausdorff. Show that if f may be extended to a continuous function g: \overline{A} \rightarrow Y, then g is uniquely determined by f.

The Attempt at a Solution



If f is a homeomorphism, we can say A is a Hausdorff space.
Just given a continuous function f, I am clueless how to start this problem.
Any advice will be appreciated.
The first thing to do is to make sure you know the definitions of everything that is mentioned: continuity, Hausdorff (from your other post, you can tick this), extension, closure, uniquely determined.

The last one might not be in your topology text. It means that if we had another continuous extension h:\overline{A}\to Y of f, then we must have g=h. So in that sense g is unique.

So your task is to suppose there are two such functions g:\overline{A}\to Y, h: \overline{A}\to Y, and to show that g(x) = h(x) for all x in \overline{A}\backslash A (since we know they agree on A already).

The Hausdorffness of Y hints as to where to start in such a proof. Suppose that g(x)\neq h(x) for some x\in\overline{A}\backslash A. Now you want to apply the given information to obtain a contradiction.

Remember to show us your work if you get stuck!
 
Thanks for your advice. I am really enjoying this problem.

My attempt to this problem is as follows:

Suppose there exist two continuous functions g,h:\overline{A} \rightarrow Y that extend f at \overline{A}. Since g(x)=h(x)=f(x) at x \in A by definition, we shall show that g(x)=h(x) at x \in \overline{A} \setminus A.
Assume g(x) \neq h(x) at x \in \overline{A} \setminus A. Since Y is a Hausdorff space, we have two disjoint open sets U and V containing g(x) and h(x) at x \in A' (A' denotes a derived set of A), respectively.
Since g and h are continuous functions, we have open sets g^{-1}(U) and h^{-1}(V) containing x at x \in A'.
We claim that O = g^{-1}(U) \cap h^{-1}(V) \cap A is not empty. Since g^{-1}(U) \cap h^{-1}(V) are open sets containing x \in A' and any open set containing x \in A' should intersect at A by definition of a limit point.
Let x' \in O.Then g(x') \neq h(x') since x' belongs to both g^{-1}(U) and h^{-1}(V) by assumption. Since x' also belongs to A, we have g(x') = h(x'), contradiction.
Thus, g(x) = h(x) at x \in \overline{A} \setminus A, and we conclude that a continuous function g: \overline{A} \rightarrow Y is a unique extension of f at \overline{A}.

Any advice will be highly appreciated.
 
Symmetryholic said:
Thanks for your advice. I am really enjoying this problem.

My attempt to this problem is as follows:

Suppose there exist two continuous functions g,h:\overline{A} \rightarrow Y that extend f at \overline{A}. Since g(x)=h(x)=f(x) at x \in A by definition, we shall show that g(x)=h(x) at x \in \overline{A} \setminus A.
Assume g(x) \neq h(x) (for some)[/color] x \in \overline{A} \setminus A. Since Y is a Hausdorff space, we have two disjoint open sets U and V containing g(x) and h(x) at x \in A' (A' denotes a derived set of A), respectively.
Since g and h are continuous functions, we have open sets g^{-1}(U) and h^{-1}(V) containing x at x \in A'.
We claim that O = g^{-1}(U) \cap h^{-1}(V) \cap A is not empty. Since g^{-1}(U) \cap h^{-1}(V) are open sets containing x \in A' and any open set containing x \in A' should intersect at A by definition of a limit point.
Let x' \in O.Then g(x') \neq h(x') since x' belongs to both g^{-1}(U) and h^{-1}(V) by assumption. Since x' also belongs to A, we have g(x') = h(x'), contradiction.
Thus, g(x) = h(x) (for all)[/color] x \in \overline{A} \setminus A, and we conclude that a continuous function g: \overline{A} \rightarrow Y is a unique extension of f at \overline{A}.
Very good! It is fun when things begin to flow so nicely.
 
Thank you for your corrections. It helped me a lot to solve this problem starting your hints.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
5K