Is Hassani's Mathematical Physics a Good Choice for Advanced Study?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on selecting a suitable mathematical physics textbook for advanced study after completing a junior year in physics. The individual has already studied "Mathematical Methods for the Physical Sciences" by Mary Boas and is considering purchasing Hassani's book. Opinions shared indicate that Hassani's text is preferred over Arfken's for its comprehensive coverage of topics, though Arfken is noted for its superior treatment of special functions, particularly Bessel functions. The consensus suggests that while Hassani is a strong choice, Arfken has its merits in specific areas. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of choosing a textbook that aligns with the reader's learning needs and preferences in mathematical physics.
Someone1987
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
I have just finished my junior year as a physics undergraduate and I am looking for a mathematical physics textbook that will help me to learn about some of the more advanced areas of the subject. I have already gone through "Mathematical Methods for the Physical Sciences" by Mary Boas. I am considering buying Hassani's book and I would just like to hear some opinions on it before I spend the money. Is this book a good choice for my next text to read on the subject? I was also considering Arfken but Hassani seems to cover all the same topics plus additional ones. Any advice or suggestions is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Overall, I kike Hassani much better than Arfken, but there are some things that Arfen does better, like special functions, e.g., the properties of the various types of Bessel functions.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Back
Top