Help with Subspace: Find U of R^2 Closed Under Mult.

  • Thread starter Thread starter gravenewworld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspace
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding a subset U of R^2 that is closed under scalar multiplication but does not qualify as a subspace of R^2. Participants discuss the necessary conditions for a subset to be a subspace and explore examples that meet the criteria of being closed under multiplication while failing to be closed under addition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants consider subsets of R^2 that are not closed under addition and question the implications of being closed under scalar multiplication. They explore the properties of sets that are closed under multiplication and seek to identify examples that lack closure under addition.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing thoughts on potential examples and properties of sets. Some guidance has been offered regarding the characteristics of sets that could satisfy the problem's requirements, but no consensus has been reached on a specific example yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and properties of vector spaces, particularly the conditions that must be met for a subset to be considered a subspace. There is a focus on the relationship between closure under scalar multiplication and addition.

gravenewworld
Messages
1,129
Reaction score
27
I have been trying this problem for hours. I can't believe I can't get it. The question is "Find a subset U of R^2 such that U is closed under scalar multiplication but is not a subspace of R^2". I know that for U to be a subspace 0 must be an element of U and U has to be closed under scalar multiplication and vector addition. If U is closed under scalar multiplication then it must contain O vector right? So I have to think of a subset that is not closed under addition, but is closed under multiplication right? I can not think of any. Does anyone have an idea of one that satifies these properties?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you think of any subsets of R^2 that aren't closed under addition?

Study your examlpes of sets closed under multiplication. Can you identify any properties they have in common? Can you then try to come up with a new example without that property?
 
I can think of subsets of R^2 that aren't closed under addition, but the fact that the set is closed under scalar multiplicaton always messes things up for me. For example {(x1,x2): x1,x2 don't=0}. I know that this isn't closed under addition because (x1,x2)+(-x1,-x2)=0 vector. But this also isn't closed under scalar multiplicaiton because 0 is an element of the field R, and 0(x1,x2)=(0,0). I have thought of examples that aren't closed under addition, but they always violate the fact that they must be closed under multiplication.
 
Hrm. Well, is there a way to take an arbitrary set and turn it into a set that is closed under multiplication?
 
The set {(x,y)|xy=0}, satisfies the required properties. This is just the set you suggested plus the element (0,0).

In order to be closed under scalar multiplication, the set has to be a union of straight lines passing through (0,0). The only proper subsets of that kind that are closed under addition are the ones that consist of only one such line.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Fred. I knew it had to be something real simple that I was completely over looking.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K