Reference that explains general relativity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on resources for understanding Einstein's formulation of gravity, specifically through the lens of the metric, Christoffel symbols, and Riemann curvature tensor. A highly recommended reference is the first chapter of "Introduction to 3+1 Numerical Relativity" by Miguel Alcubierre, which provides a concise summary of general relativity. Additionally, Sean Carroll's lectures and notes, as well as Alex Maloney's lectures, are suggested for deeper insights into the subject. The discussion emphasizes the importance of these resources for both beginners and those revisiting the topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts, including metric and curvature.
  • Familiarity with Christoffel symbols and their role in general relativity.
  • Basic knowledge of vierbein and spin connection formalism.
  • Experience with mathematical physics and tensor calculus.
NEXT STEPS
  • Read the first chapter of "Introduction to 3+1 Numerical Relativity" by Miguel Alcubierre.
  • Explore Sean Carroll's comprehensive book on general relativity for a more complete understanding.
  • Watch Leonard Susskind's General Relativity lectures available on YouTube.
  • Review Alex Maloney's lecture notes on general relativity for additional insights and recommended readings.
USEFUL FOR

Students, physicists, and educators interested in mastering general relativity, particularly those seeking clear explanations of complex concepts such as the metric, Christoffel symbols, and vierbein formalism.

jinbaw
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I need to write few paragraphs to explain Einstein's formulation of gravity in terms of the metric, christofell symbols, and Reimann curvature tensor. I also want to write about the veirbein and spin connection formalism of gravity.
Can anyone suggest good, yet simple references that i might use for this purpose? thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jinbaw said:
Hi guys,

I need to write few paragraphs to explain Einstein's formulation of gravity in terms of the metric, christofell symbols, and Reimann curvature tensor. I also want to write about the veirbein and spin connection formalism of gravity.
Can anyone suggest good, yet simple references that i might use for this purpose? thank you!

One of the best concise summaries of GR that I've ever seen is the first chapter of the book "Introduction to 3+1 Numerical Relativity", by Miguel Alcubierre. The book itself is not what you are after becasue it is about numerical implementations, but the introduction is excellent as a summary. The nice thing is that some pages of the first chapter are available to read at Amazon. So you can quickly scan this to see if it's what you want. In my view, the price of the book is worth the first chapter alone.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0199205671/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited:
Thank you stevenb, i had a look at the Alcubierre's book. it is exactly what i want to understand the formulation of gravity in terms of the metric. Do u know of any book that would introduce the concept of veirbeins in an analogous manner?
 
Daverz i had a look at the notes written by Caroll, but i don't know why i do not have access to the videos. Thanks anyways:)
 
jinbaw said:
Thank you stevenb, i had a look at the Alcubierre's book. it is exactly what i want to understand the formulation of gravity in terms of the metric. Do u know of any book that would introduce the concept of veirbeins in an analogous manner?

Caroll's book is also good and more complete than his notes. There is also the Alex Maloney lectures at

http://www.physics.mcgill.ca/~maloney/514/

There are many other good books and Dr. Maloney recommends some in his lectures.

And, youtube has the Susskind GR lectures. You can find it easiliy if you do a search on youtube "Susskind General Relativity Lecture".

Note that the Alcubierre's book is very advanced after chapter 1, and the first chapter summary is only good as a concise reference once you understand the material. However, I wish I had that summary when I was learning the basics because it provides a good roadmap while learning and a great refresher course if you want to go back and relearn after not using it for a few years. I also wish I had those Susskind lectures because he has a gift for making the subject easy, which it actually is (at least conceptually) if taught correctly and studied diligently.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K