Can an interval with all positive functions of x be proven?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 3K views
mathkillsalot
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Can an interval with all positive functions of x be proven??

f(x) has to always be greater that 0. How do you prove this??

f is continuous as c and f(c)>0. prove that there is an open interval (a.b) centered at c such that f(x)>0 for all x that are elements of (a,b)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


This comes straight from the definition of continuity. Apply the definition of continuity to your point c. What does it say?
 


lim f(x) = f(c)
x -> c ?

but i don't get how it proves that f(a) and f(b) are positive...
 


There's another definition of continuity. Use the epsilon-delta definition and choose an appropriate value for epsilon.
 


wait...so since f(c) is positive, and (a,b) are approaching c, it means that f(a) and f(b) are approaching a positive number f(c)? and that they are positive?
 


mathkillsalot said:
wait...so since f(c) is positive, and (a,b) are approaching c, it means that f(a) and f(b) are approaching a positive number f(c)? and that they are positive?

I'm not sure what you mean by (a,b) approaching c, but it sounds like you do have the right idea. Since f is continuous at c, we can choose values that are close enough to c (a and b) such that f(a) and f(b) are both positive and f is positive on (a,b). Unfortunately, your proof needs to be a little more rigorous than this. From here, you need to use the epsilon-delta definition of continuity to actually prove it.
 


okaaay...thankyou :))
and I forgot something, we're supposed to apply the sign preserving property on this. Do i still need the epsilon-delta definition of continuity?
can't I just assign positive values for x?? or is that wrong?
 


If you can use the sign-preserving property, it's trivial. The answer follows straight from the definition and you don't need the e/d definition.
 


okay, thank you so much :)))))))
 


thankyou :))
and I just requested (chroot?) to change my username... hahaha