How Fast Must a Golf Ball Travel to Avoid a Windmill Blade?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NotaPhysicsMan
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the minimum speed a golf ball must travel to avoid being hit by a rotating windmill blade at a miniature golf course. The windmill has 8 blades rotating at an angular speed of 1.25 rad/s. The gap between blades is determined to be 22.5 degrees, or 0.39 radians. By calculating the time it takes for the blade to sweep through this gap and the distance the ball must travel (its diameter of 0.045 m), the minimum speed of the ball is derived to be approximately 0.01397 m/s.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular velocity and angular displacement
  • Basic knowledge of kinematics equations
  • Familiarity with radians and degrees conversion
  • Concept of arc length in circular motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between angular velocity and linear velocity in circular motion
  • Learn about kinematic equations for rotational motion
  • Explore the concept of angular displacement in detail
  • Investigate practical applications of physics in amusement park rides and miniature golf
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rotating systems and their applications in real-world scenarios.

NotaPhysicsMan
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Hey, any ideas on this double starred, hard question :(

A golf ball passing trhough a windmill at a miniature golf course. The windmill has 8 blades and rotates at an angular speed of 1.25 rad/s clockwise. The opening between successive blades is equal to the width of a blade. A golf ball of diameter 4.50x10^-2 m is just passing by one of the rotating blades. What must be the minimum speed of the ball so that it will not be hit by the next blade?

Ok, my thought is, I need to find time for a blade to rotate theta, and I need the arc length for that. With arc length I have some way to compare the diameter and the space opening between the ball and blade. Lost from that point...

Any ideas, Great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How far does the ball have to travel?
How big (as an angle) are the gaps in the windmill?
 
Ok, knowing w, I think I can use theta= w(avg) x time . I don't have time. I have 1.25rad/s. Hold it is this approach right. Ok I have 1.25 rad, 2pie is a full revolution or 360 degrees. There is a 5.02 factor between 1.25 rad and 2 pie. Ok, 1.25 rad is equal to 71.61 degrees. I multiply that by 5.026 and divide by 16 (total equal proportions including space and blade) and I get roughly 22.5 degrees for each gap?

As for how far does the ball have to travel, is that relevant? I mean it just has to travel pass the width of the blade.
 
You should be looking at things like: There are 8 blades, so there are 8 gaps. That means that each gap is going to be 1/16 of a revolution, or an angle of \frac{2\pi}{16}=\frac{\pi}{8}.

Then you can determine the time that the windmill takes to turn that far and so on.
 
ok, so my way was also corrrect than ... 22.5 degrees is equal 0.39 rad which is equal to pie/8. Now for the next part, time. I'm thinking we can use theta= 1/2 (w avg )t. Since the mill will spin always at 1.25 rad/s the w avg is still 1.25rad/s. Theta = 0.39 rad, I substitute and solve for t.

t = 0.628 s.
Thinking...
 
ok I figure: need the angular velocity of ball (w) then we could use this value and substitute it into V=rw? so diameter we know is 0.0450, d/2 = r. So, w = theta/time. So, 0.39/0.628 gives 0.621 rad/s. Substitute it into V=rw, V=0.01397m/s?
 
\theta=\omega_{avg}t
(There's no \frac{1}{2} you may be thinking of \theta=\alpha_{avg}t.)
Which will change your time.

Then the ball needs to travel it's diameter in the time. so v=\frac{d}{t}

(This would be a lot easier to explain with drawings.)
 
Everything sounds good, except I'm not sure I understand the concept, the ball needs to travel it's diameter?
 
I can try to do ascii art:
Imagine you're looking at the windmill from the top
Then the beginning of the ball crossing will look like this
Code:
 |  Blade (moving down on screen)



o|--> (Ball about to cross)
 |
 | Blade (moving down)

And the end of the ball crossing will look like
Code:
 |
 |Blade (moving down on screen)
 |o--> (Ball having crossed)



 |
So, if the ball barely scrapes the tail end of the blade before it starts crossing, and barely gets scraped by the blade at the end of the crossing, then it's traveled it's diameter in distance.
 
  • #10
Well, the diagrams make some sense, excpet I don't see how both parts of the mill can move down, shouldn't it be rotating so that one side goes up while the other comes down. But yes, I get it now, I thought it was the travel distance before and reaches the mill plus the distance to get pass it.

Thanks!
 
  • #11
NotaPhysicsMan said:
Well, the diagrams make some sense, excpet I don't see how both parts of the mill can move down, shouldn't it be rotating so that one side goes up while the other comes down. But yes, I get it now, I thought it was the travel distance before and reaches the mill plus the distance to get pass it.

I was only drawing the bottom parts of the mill that interact with the ball.
 
  • #12
If I could remember correctly, this is a question from "Cutnell & Johnson Physics", right? For the golf ball to pass through the gap of the windmill with minimum speed, it must be at the beginning of the open gap before going through it as suggested by the diagram. The distance traveled is the diameter of the ball because this is the minimum distance the ball must travel in order to get itself pass through the gap. From the question, we know the angular speed and can find the angular displacement easily. From these infos, we can work out the time needed for the blade to sweep out the open gap. The time needed here is equal to the time needed for the ball to travel through the gap. Knowing the displament of the ball which is the diameter and the time, we can then calculate the minimum speed of the ball.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Yup Cutnell and Johnson, and thanks for making it even more clear lol, esp the distance/diameter traveled by ball, was a tad fuzzy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K