Rotational and translational motion hybrid quetion. How to digest it?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two circular discs of different masses and radii placed on a rough inclined plane. Participants are exploring the dynamics of rotational and translational motion to determine which disc reaches the bottom first.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are analyzing the effects of mass and radius on the acceleration of the discs, questioning the role of friction and the conditions for pure rolling. There is an exploration of Newton's laws and torque in relation to the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have reached conclusions about the acceleration being independent of mass and radius, while others challenge these conclusions by providing counterexamples. There is an ongoing examination of the reasoning and calculations presented, with some guidance offered on applying concepts correctly.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the complexities of rotational motion and the implications of different inclinations on the behavior of the discs. There is an acknowledgment of potential confusion and the need for clarity in understanding the underlying physics.

vkash
Messages
316
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



If two circular discs A and B of mass m and 3m and radii R,2R, respectively. are placed from the top of a rough inclined plane, which disc will reach bottom first.2. The attempt at a solution
NOTE: u is coefficient of friction (both kinetic and static). g is acceleration due to gravity & t is inclination of inclined plane.
friction on disc of radii R is u*g*cos(t) and that in 2R is 3g*u*cos(t). In starting there will not pure rolling but after some time there will pure rolling(may not if inclined is too small). In any case friction force will remain as it in starting(u*g*cos(t) and u*g*cos(t)). so linear acceleration of both the objects will different so their time to reach bottom should different(Heavier should reach late on bottom larger retardation). BUT MY EXPLANATION IS WRONG WHERE SM I WRONG. that's my question to you.
please try to answer with good answer.

Translational and rotational motion are confusing[/color] my mind. Do you have any way to understand rotational in better way.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
vkash said:

Homework Statement



If two circular discs A and B of mass m and 3m and radii R,2R, respectively. are placed from the top of a rough inclined plane, which disc will reach bottom first.


2. The attempt at a solution
NOTE: u is coefficient of friction (both kinetic and static). g is acceleration due to gravity & t is inclination of inclined plane.
friction on disc of radii R is u*g*cos(t) and that in 2R is 3g*u*cos(t). In starting there will not pure rolling but after some time there will pure rolling(may not if inclined is too small).
What does that mean?
In any case friction force will remain as it in starting(u*g*cos(t) and u*g*cos(t)).
That's wrong.
so linear acceleration of both the objects will different so their time to reach bottom should different(Heavier should reach late on bottom larger retardation). BUT MY EXPLANATION IS WRONG WHERE SM I WRONG. that's my question to you.
please try to answer with good answer.
Try applying Newton's laws to the problem to analyze what will happen.
 
I have reached to a solution that is. acceleration of both the object does not depend on the mass or radius(seems amazing). The acceleration comes out to be 2*u*g*cos(t). here t is angle of inclination of inclined plane, u is coefficient of friction and well known g is acceleration due to gravity in free fall with respect to inertial frame.

Am i correct?
 
No. For example, if the surface was horizontal (t=0), there'd be no acceleration, but your result says there would be.
 
vela said:
No. For example, if the surface was horizontal (t=0), there'd be no acceleration, but your result says there would be.

I think it's answer is in the way i reach to this result. I do this in this way.
watching through the frame in center of the ring/disc/sphere.
T(torque)=f(friction)*r(radius of the object)=I(moment of inertia around COM))*a(angular acceleration disc/ring etc) ------------------------(1)
any object we take it will have a radius of gyration around that point. let me take moment of inertia around the center of mas I=mk2.
so last equation (1) changed to
[itex]a=\frac{f}{mk}[/itex]
k has always a relation with r in the terms of natural number so let r=sk (for ring it is 21/2)
[itex]acceleration =\frac{s*friction}{mass}[/itex]
for given condition friction /mass = constant (if inclination and coefficient are same)

you say if inclination is zero. in that line of action of friction and gravity are passing through center so no torque no rotation.
I can realize that i represent it in very complex way. Even i am not sure that when i will see it next time will i able to understand it or not.:biggrin:
have i applied concepts in right way or not no matter if i have done little mistake in calculation(that can be cured easily). Answer of the question in my book that all will reach simultaneously and my result agrees with that(it's amazing).
If i am wrong then point out me there.
In last post i do this for disc.
After all i have got answer. I want to say thanks to you vala and DOc Al. Keep helping guys.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K