Ring and solid sphere rolling down an incline - rotation problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a solid sphere, hollow sphere, disk, and ring released from the top of an incline, with the focus on determining which object reaches the bottom first under the condition of sufficient friction to prevent slipping of the hollow sphere.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions for pure rolling versus slipping for each object and derive expressions for acceleration. There is an exploration of the minimum coefficient of friction required for the hollow sphere to roll and its implications for the other objects. Questions arise regarding specific values used in calculations and the interpretation of terms like "just sufficient."

Discussion Status

Participants have provided insights into the calculations and assumptions regarding the frictional forces and accelerations of the objects. There is a recognition of the solid sphere's acceleration being the highest among the pure-rolling objects, and some participants suggest comparing accelerations instead of times for simplicity. However, no explicit consensus has been reached on the final outcome.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the interpretation of the term "sufficient" in relation to friction and its effect on the motion of the ring compared to the other objects. Participants note the need for clarity on the values used in the calculations, particularly for the hollow sphere.

Krushnaraj Pandya
Gold Member
Messages
697
Reaction score
73

Homework Statement


A solid sphere, hollow sphere, disk and ring are released simultaneously from top of a incline. Friction is sufficient to prevent slipping of hollow sphere- what will reach the bottom first?

Homework Equations


a in pure rolling down an incline=gsinθ/(1 + I/mR^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


So first I determined which objects are pure-rolling and which are slipping. Let's say I/mR^2=n which is just the coefficient with the mr^2 term for convenience. Now from the above formula acceleration for a body in pure rolling is given by gsinθ/(1+n). Now, mgsinθ-frictionforce=mgsinθ/(1+n) therefore frictional force=nmgsinθ/(1+n). Using frictional force<=μN and N=mgcosθ we get μ>=ntanθ/1+n. So minimum coefficient of friction required for hollow sphere to roll is 2tanθ/5, plugging n for the other bodies we see that all the bodies except the ring will be pure rolling. Now when all 4 are pure rolling, solid sphere has highest value of acceleration so reaches first, but now ring is slipping so the competition is between the solid sphere and the ring.
Using s=(1/2)at^2 (s is same for both bodies) t for solid sphere is sqrt(14s/5gsinθ). I'm getting very confused finding the t for the ring though, any help would be appreciated-thank you
Edit: So, the acceleration for the ring is g(sinθ-μcosθ), plugging the minimum value of μ we found for hollow sphere, we get t=sqrt(10s/3gsinθ) which indicates the solid sphere will reach first. Is that correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
minimum coefficient of friction required for hollow sphere to roll is 2tanθ/5
Is that right? What value of n are you plugging in?
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
Friction is sufficient to prevent slipping of hollow sphere-
Should this say "just sufficient"?
 
haruspex said:
Is that right? What value of n are you plugging in?
n is 2/3 for a hollow sphere. (2/3)/(1+(2/3)) gives 2/5 so 2/5tanθ.
haruspex said:
Should this say "just sufficient"?
It doesn't say that. But knowing the way around this book, I can safely say that was most probably the meaning. Otherwise there'd be two cases- one where all are rolling and one where only the ring isn't; in any case the solid sphere seems to win both races
 
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
n is 2/3 for a hollow sphere. (2/3)/(1+(2/3)) gives 2/5 so 2/5tanθ.
Sorry, I misread it as solid sphere.
 
haruspex said:
Sorry, I misread it as solid sphere.
so everything's correct?
 
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
So, the acceleration for the ring is g(sinθ-μcosθ), plugging the minimum value of μ we found for hollow sphere, we get t=sqrt(10s/3gsinθ) which indicates the solid sphere will reach first. Is that correct?
Yes, this all looks right, but I think you can make it a bit simpler by comparing accelerations instead of times: (5/7)g sin(θ) for the solid sphere, (3/5)g sin(θ) for the ring.
 
haruspex said:
Yes, this all looks right, but I think you can make it a bit simpler by comparing accelerations instead of times: (5/7)g sin(θ) for the solid sphere, (3/5)g sin(θ) for the ring.
Alright thank you
 
haruspex said:
Should this say "just sufficient"?
On reflection, it does not need to. Increasing it will slow the ring further but not affect the others.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
haruspex said:
On reflection, it does not need to. Increasing it will slow the ring further but not affect the others.
ah! right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
887
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K