Another Megathrust event in Indonesia tonite

  • Thread starter Thread starter davenn
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent megathrust earthquake off the NW coast of Sumatera was initially recorded as a Mw8.7 by the USGS but was later revised to Mw8.6. This event was followed by a Mw8.2 aftershock, with significant seismic signals detected in Sydney, Australia. The earthquakes occurred on strike-slip faults, reducing the risk of a major tsunami, which has relieved concerns in the region. The discussion highlights the challenges of recording seismic events amidst urban noise and the limitations of current recording equipment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of seismic event magnitudes (Mw scale)
  • Familiarity with seismograph operation and data analysis
  • Knowledge of tectonic plate boundaries and fault types
  • Experience with seismic signal processing techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of strike-slip faults on tsunami generation
  • Explore advancements in seismograph technology, particularly 24-bit A to D converters
  • Study the historical seismic activity in the Sumatera region
  • Learn about the Centroid Moment Tensor and its applications in earthquake analysis
USEFUL FOR

Seismologists, earthquake researchers, and hobbyists interested in seismic activity and data analysis will benefit from this discussion.

davenn
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
9,715
Reaction score
11,716
hi gang

2 hrs after the event started to roll in on my seismograph, here in Sydney Australia, I am still recording a significant signal.

The quake is off the NW coast of Sumatera with almost an identical epicentral point as the 2004, Mw9+ event.
Tonite's event was initially listed as a Mw8.7 by the USGA and ~ an hr or so later was revised down to a Mw8.6.
I haven't seen any specific reports as yet other than comments to the effect that a tsunami was generated (USGS)

Dave
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
This has been followed by another major event in the same area

a Prelim Mw 8.2 aftershock. I am finding it hard to see as the initial event is obscurring the signal a lot.
here is a compressed screen shot from my analysis program of the initial event...

attachment.php?attachmentid=46105&stc=1&d=1334144956.jpg


cheers
Dave
 

Attachments

  • 120411 Mw 8.6 offshr NW Sumatera1.jpg
    120411 Mw 8.6 offshr NW Sumatera1.jpg
    104.4 KB · Views: 660
another earthquake this time in Mexico 7.0...
 
meidan said:
another earthquake this time in Mexico 7.0...

latest data has it downgraded to a Mw6.5, still a respectable event
I didnt record it here in Australia, its usually got to be M7.0 and greater when from the western Americas ( USA down to Chile).
Its a real balancing act for me, I live in the suburbs with lots of manmade noise from clothes washing machines bouncing around on spin cycle to much heavy traffic on the road.

Keeping the gain of the system a bit lower can be a blessing in disguise as in the big events of last nite. Even at only 4500 km from the event, The M8.6 still maxed out my 14bit A to D converter ( time for a 24bit one haha). But not as bad as some of my fellow recording stations in the USA who's systems, with their much higher gain, were maxing out from almost the start of the event, even tho they were 4 x the distance from the epicentre as me.

cheers
Dave
 
Well it looks like Sumatera and the surrounding region really dodged a bullet last nite.
Both the events were a bit to the west of the downward thrusting slab of the Indo-Australian Plate. Their Centroid Moment Tensor solutions revealed that they were on strike - slip faults. This pretty much allieviated the possibility of any significant tsunami being generated. Everyone breathes a sigh of relief :)

Its still amazing that after 8 years, a Mw9.2 and a Mw8.7 (some months later), that so much stress was still pent up in the region.

Dave
 
It's great to have you here Dave.
 
awww thanks Evo :)

The subject is a bit of a passionate hobbyhorse of mine haha
has been for many years

I hope general discussion of events etc, like above, is within the guidelines of the forum rather than always just being specific question/answer type threads

cheers
Dave
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K