How to Prove Pedoe's Inequality for Two Triangles?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving Pedoe's Inequality for two triangles, which involves comparing a specific algebraic expression derived from the sides of the triangles and their areas. The inquiry includes theoretical aspects and mathematical reasoning related to the inequality.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Vivek presents Pedoe's Inequality and expresses difficulty in proving it, suggesting the use of the cosine rule and Hero's formula.
  • Hurkyl inquires about the conditions for equality in the inequality, proposing a proof technique based on a different theorem.
  • Vivek confirms that equality occurs if the two triangles are similar and requests further elaboration on Hurkyl's idea.
  • Arildno shares a link to an article that contains relevant information about the inequality.
  • A participant provides a detailed mathematical derivation involving vector representations and area calculations, attempting to establish the inequality through algebraic manipulation.
  • Vivek acknowledges the contributions and expresses appreciation for the shared resources and ideas.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various approaches and insights, but there is no consensus on a definitive proof or resolution of the inequality. Multiple competing views and methods remain present in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes complex mathematical expressions and assumptions that are not fully resolved, such as the conditions under which the inequality holds and the implications of triangle similarity.

maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi everyone

I need some help proving Pedoe's Inequality for two triangles, which states that

a_{1}^2(b_{2}^2+c_{2}^2-a_{2}^2) + b_{1}^2(c_{2}^2 + a_{2}^2 - b_{2}^2) + c_{1}^2(a_{2}^2 + b_{2}^2 - c_{2}^2) \geq 16F_{1}F_{2}

where (a_{1},b_{1},c_{1}) and (a_{2},b_{2},c_{2}) are the sides of triangles A_{1}B_{1}C_{1} and A_{2}B_{2}C_{2} respectively and F_{1}, F_{2} are their areas.

The expressions in the brackets suggest usage of the cosine rule, which gives b_{2}^2 + c_{2}^2 - a_{2}^2 = 2b_{2}c_{2}\cos A_{2}. Using this the left hand side transforms to three terms of the type 2a_{1}^2b_{2}c_{2}\cos A_{2} but this doesn't seem to help. The right hand side can be transformed using Hero's formula for the area of either triangle. This also gets rid of 16. But I don't know how to proceed further.

I would be grateful if someone could suggest a way out. In case there is a proof available on the internet, please let me know...I am searching for it myself on google right now...so far I have found several pages just listing the theorem's statement (mostly copied from wiki).

Thanks...

Cheers
vivek
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi again

I posted this sometime back...apparently it was read by very few people. With this reminder, I am hoping someone who has some idea about the inequality can help me out. Its urgent (but not homework)...

Thanks and Cheers
Vivek
 
To the Moderator: Please shift this to the appropriate forum.
 
Do you know when equality is supposed to happen? If so, you could use this type of proof technique:


Theorem: 2^x > x^2 for all x > 4.

Proof:

Consider f(x) = 2^x - x^2. Then f(4) = 0.
f'(x) = 2^x (log 2) - 2x
f'(4) > 0, so f is increasing at x = 4.
f''(x) = 2^x (log 2)^2 - 2
f''(x) > 0 for all x >= 4, so f'(x) is increasing for x >= 4.
Therefore, f(x) is increasing on x >= 4, so 0 is its minimum, which occurs at x = 4.
Therefore, 2^x > x^2 for all x > 4.
 
Hi Hurkyl

Thanks for your reply. Equality occurs iff the two triangles are similar. Could you please elaborate on your idea a bit?

Thanks and cheers
vivek
 
Hi, maverick.
I googled a bit, and found the following article.
Have fun!
http://jipam.vu.edu.au/images/106_03_JIPAM/106_03.pdf
Your inequality is 3.13
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi arildno

Thanks so much for the pdf file. I am sorry for this delayed reply (I was busy with tests). I've seen some of it and will go through it in detail.

Thanks and cheers
Vivek
 
Let a and b be the vectot , let v be the angle between a and b, then
aXb=a*b*sin(v)
a.b=a*b*cos(v)
(axb)*(axb)= a^2*b^2*sin(v)^2=a^2*b^2*(1-cos(v)^2)=a^2*b^2-(a.b)^2
let c=a-b, then the area of triangle a,b,c is
F=(1/2)*a*b*sin(v)
F^2 = (1/4)*a^2*b^2*sin(v)^2 = (1/4)*(axb)*(axb)=(1/4)(a^2*b^2-(a.b)^2)

Similiarly, define a' and b' as the vector,let v' be the angle between a' and b', let c'=a'-c'.
The area of triangle a', b', c' is
F1=(1/2)*a'*b'*sin(v')
F1^2 = (1/4)*(a'^2*b'^2-(a'.b')^2)

(16*F1*F)^2 = 16*(a^2*b^2-(a.b)^2)(a'^2*b'^2-(a'.b')^2)
= 16*(a^2*b^2*a'^2*b'^2 - a^2*b^2*(a'.b')^2 - a'^2*b'^2*(a.b)^2 + (a.b)^2*(a'.b')^2) ------(1)

Let A = a'^2*(-a^2+b^2+c^2) + b'^2*(a^2-b^2+c^2) +c'^2*(a^2+b^2-c^2)
because c^2= a^2+b^2-2*a*b*cos(v) = a^2+b^2-2*(a.b)
c'^2 =a'^2+b'^2-2*(a'.b')
subsitute c, c' in A

A = 2*(a'^2*(b^2-(a.b)) + 2*(b'^2*(a^2-(a.b)) + (a'^2+b'^2-2*(a'.b'))*2*(a.b)
= 2*(a'^2*b^2 + b'^2*a^2 -2*(a.b)*(a'.b'))
= 2*((a'*b-a*b')^2 + 2*a*b*a'*b' - 2*(a.b)*(a'.b'))

A^2 = 4*((a'*b - a*b')^4 + 4*(a'*b -a*b')^2*a*b*a'*b' + 4*(a*b*a'*b')^2 - 4*(a'*b-a*b')^2*(a.b)*(a'.b')
-8*a*b*a'*b'*(a.b)*(a'.b') + 4(a.b)^2(a'.b')^2) -------------(2)

Substract (1) from (2)

A^2 - (16*F1*F)^2 = 4*((a'*b - a*b')^4 +4*(a'*b-a*b')^2*(a*b*a'*b' - (a.b)*(a'.b')) +
4*a^2*b^2(a'.b')^2 + 4*a'^2*b'^2*(a.b)^2 - 8*a*b*a'*b'*(a.b)*(a'.b'))
= 4*(a'*b-a*b')^4 + 16*(a'*b-a*b')^2*(a*b*a'*b'-(a.b)*(a'.b')) +
16*(a*b*(a'.b')-a'*b'*(a.b))^2
It's easy to see that on the right hand side, the first and the third term are large than zero, the second term only need
concern a*b*a'*b'-(a.b)*(a'.b'), because
(a.b)=a*b*cos(v)
(a'.b')=a'*b'*cos(v')
so a*b*a'*b'-(a.b)*(a'.b') = a*b*a'*b'*(1-cos(v)*cos(v'))
since cos(v)<=1 cos(v')<=1 so cos(v)*cos(v')<=1, so a*b*a'*b'-(a.b)*(a'*b') >=0
We draw conclusion that A^2-(16*F*F1)^2 >= 0 therefore A>=16*F*F1

To make the equal sign hold, we must have
a'*b-a*b'=0 ======> a'/b' = a/b
AND
a*b*(a'.b')-a'*b'*(a.b)=0 ===> a*b*a'*b'*(cos(v')-cos(v))=0 =====> cos(v')=cos(v) ====> v'=v
This is equivalent to the codition that the triangles abc and a'b'c' are similar.
 
Hi Philip,

I'm sorry I didn't see your post earlier. Interesting. Thanks.

Cheers
Vivek
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
9K