What Sets Chronon Apart from Planck's Time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary
Chronons and Planck time are often confused, but they are not the same; Planck time is approximately 0.539 E-43 seconds, while the definition of a chronon varies and lacks a standardized meaning. Planck time has been established for over a century as a fundamental unit in physics, derived from natural constants. In contrast, the concept of a chronon is less defined and can differ based on the context or author discussing it. The inconsistency in the definitions and values of both units across various sources contributes to the confusion. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for clarity in discussions of quantum mechanics and theoretical physics.
Nim
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between a chronon and Planck's time? A few websites said they were the same thing. But other websites showed Planck's time as being smaller than a chronon. And those websites didn't always agree on how small Planck's time or a chronon is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Nim
What is the difference between a chronon and Planck's time? A few websites said they were the same thing. But other websites showed Planck's time as being smaller than a chronon. And those websites didn't always agree on how small Planck's time or a chronon is.

One way to approach this question is to ask what has traditionally usually been meant by "Planck time"

Planck proposed a set of natural units in 1899 to a meeting of the Prussian Academy and the time unit he proposed was
for practical purposes the same as what is called "Planck time" today----about 0.539 E-43 second.

For over 100 years the Planck time unit has been this.

What the "chronon" is must depend on whatever writer is talking. It is not a well-established traditional thing, so could mean anything someone wants it to mean. The basic string theory scale is not solidly nailed down so if there is a "chronon" in that context it could be drifting around changing from author to author.

Here is how to remember Planck units:

Memorize what the area is and get all the rest from that.

The area is hbar G/c3

Therefore the length is sqrt(hbar G/c3)

The unit time is how long light takes to go unit length so it equals unit length divided by c. Or you can divide by c2 inside the square root and get

Planck time unit equals sqrt(hbar G/c5)


Since Planck time is 0.539 E-43 second, if you multiply by E45 you get 53.9 seconds which is on same scale as a ordinary minute.

So next time someone on telephone says "please wait a minute. I put you on hold for a minute" remember that this means

E45 Planck time units, or maybe you like it better written

1045 Planck time units
 
Thanks for the answser.

This isn't a physics question. But how do you make those floating numbers like that 45 you have by the 10?
 
Originally posted by Nim
Thanks for the answser.

This isn't a physics question. But how do you make those floating numbers like that 45 you have by the 10?

A2 is written like this (but with the spaces removed)

A[s u p]2[/s u p]


subscripts are written like superscripts except you say "sub"
instead of "sup"

if you want to see how anyone made a math symbol they wrote in their post, click on "quote" below their post AS IF you were going to reply and wanted to quote them in your reply-----you can look at how they typed stuff and you don't have to reply unless you want----you can just back away
 
marcus said:
about 0.539 E-43 second.
The area is hbar G/c3
marcus said:
Therefore the length is sqrt(hbar G/c3)
What are E and G?
 
E45 just means 10^45
G is the gravitational constant
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K