1 last infinite series, power series

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves particles bouncing between two endpoints, x=0 and x=1, with some escaping at each endpoint. The original poster is tasked with writing an infinite series to represent the fraction of particles escaping at both endpoints and summing these series. The goal is to determine the maximum fraction of particles that can escape at x=0.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the fractions of particles that escape and are reflected at each impact with the endpoints. There are attempts to formulate the series for both x=0 and x=1, with some questioning the initial assumptions about how particles behave upon impact.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have suggested creating tables to visualize the impacts and fractions, while others are reconsidering their initial calculations and assumptions about the behavior of the particles.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding whether the fraction r remains constant across impacts, and participants are grappling with the implications of this assumption on their calculations. Additionally, there are references to the maximum fraction of particles escaping, indicating a potential limit to the results being discussed.

Liquidxlax
Messages
312
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



suppose a large number of particles are bouncing back and forth between x=0 and x=1, except that at each endpoint some escape. Let r be the fraction of particles reflected, so then you can assume (1-r) is the number of particles that escape at each wall. Suppose particles start at x=0 and head towards x=1; eventually all particles escape. Write and infinite series for the fraction at which escape at x=1 and x=0. Sum both series. What is the largest fraction of the particles which can escape at x=o



Homework Equations



sn-rsn = a(1-r^n)/(1-r)

0<r<1

The Attempt at a Solution




x=1 (1-r) + (1-r)^2... (1-r)^n

and same for x=0

sum

2(1-r) + 2(1-r)^2... + 2(1-r)^n
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Liquidxlax said:
x=1 (1-r) + (1-r)^2... (1-r)^n

and same for x=0

You need to thinkl this through more carefully... the first impact is at x=1, what fraction of the original number of particles escapes? what fraction of the original number of particles doesn't? The next impact is at x=0 (not x=1) the first impact is at x=1, what fraction of the original number of particles escapes? what fraction of the original number of particles doesn't? ...and so on
 
gabbagabbahey said:
You need to thinkl this through more carefully... the first impact is at x=1, what fraction of the original number of particles escapes? what fraction of the original number of particles doesn't? The next impact is at x=0 (not x=1) the first impact is at x=1, what fraction of the original number of particles escapes? what fraction of the original number of particles doesn't? ...and so on

at x=1 (1-r) escape and r is reflected... at x=0 (1-2r) escape and r/2 reflected? honestly this is supposed to be the easiest stuff, yet i have no problem with the apparent hard stuff...
 
Liquidxlax said:
at x=1 (1-r) escape and r is reflected... at x=0 (1-2r) escape and r/2 reflected?

Not quite...the point is that the first impact with x=0 happens after the first impact with x=1. If there is a fraction [itex]r[/itex] left after the 1st impact with x=1 and a fraction (1-r) of those espaces, doesn't that mean that [itex]r(1-r)[/itex] escape the 1st impact at x=0, and [itex]r^2[/itex] are reflected?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Not quite...the point is that the first impact with x=0 happens after the first impact with x=1. If there is a fraction [itex]r[/itex] left after the 1st impact with x=1 and a fraction (1-r) of those espaces, doesn't that mean that [itex]r(1-r)[/itex] escape the 1st impact at x=0, and [itex]r^2[/itex] are reflected?

i did write that initially on paper, but i couldn't see it working. but i guess i could try again

so r^n(1-r) or (r^n - r^(n+1))
 
Liquidxlax said:
i did write that initially on paper, but i couldn't see it working. but i guess i could try again

so r^n(1-r) or (r^n - r^(n+1))

I suggest making a table for the first few impacts at x=0 and at x=1, with the fraction (of the intial number of particles) that is reflected and the fraction that escapes.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
I suggest making a table for the first few impacts at x=0 and at x=1, with the fraction (of the intial number of particles) that is reflected and the fraction that escapes.

is r changing with each term, or is it a constant fraction?
 
Liquidxlax said:
is r changing with each term, or is it a constant fraction?


From the way the question is written, it is constant
 
gabbagabbahey said:
From the way the question is written, it is constant

if that is true then

x=1 would be (1-r) + r^2(r-1) +... r^2n(r-1)

x=0 would be r(1-r) + r^3(r-1) +... r^(2n+1)(r-1)

so added together you get

(1-r) + r(1-r) + r^2(1-r) +... r^n(1-r)

Sn = ((1-r)(1-r^n))/(1+r)

well not sure about ^^^ because someone said that the max electrons leaving at x=1 as n approaches infinity is 1/2
 
  • #10
can anyone help me real quick, i just want to get my assignment done
 
  • #11
Liquidxlax said:
if that is true then

x=1 would be (1-r) + r^2(r-1) +... r^2n(r-1)

x=0 would be r(1-r) + r^3(r-1) +... r^(2n+1)(r-1)

so added together you get

(1-r) + r(1-r) + r^2(1-r) +... r^n(1-r)

Sn = ((1-r)(1-r^n))/(1+r)

well not sure about ^^^ because someone said that the max electrons leaving at x=1 as n approaches infinity is 1/2
That looks more like the number that are reflected...I thought you were supposed to find the fraction that escape
 
  • #12
gabbagabbahey said:
That looks more like the number that are reflected...I thought you were supposed to find the fraction that escape

aww crap, that is what i thought...


but what i thought i was doing initially was, taking the reflected particles and subtracting another fraction of what escapes by finding a new reflected amount say r^2 are reflected from r
 
  • #13
Liquidxlax said:
aww crap, that is what i thought...


but what i thought i was doing initially was, taking the reflected particles and subtracting another fraction of what escapes by finding a new reflected amount say r^2 are reflected from r

Hint: The total fraction of particles that escape at each side will be the fraction that impact there initially minus the total fraction that are reflected off that side
 
  • #14
gabbagabbahey said:
Hint: The total fraction of particles that escape at each side will be the fraction that impact there initially minus the total fraction that are reflected off that side

well w.e it is to late anyway, i had to hand in an incomplete assignment...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K