What do P, p(subscript r), and L represent in the 2-Body Lagrangian problem?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2-body Lagrangian
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of quantities P, p(subscript r), and L in the context of the 2-Body Lagrangian problem involving two point masses connected by a spring in polar coordinates. Participants explore the implications of these quantities in relation to the center of mass and relative coordinates, focusing on their meanings and roles in the equations of motion derived from the Lagrangian formalism.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the use of center of mass coordinate R and relative coordinate r, questioning the representation of P, p(subscript r), and L in this context.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of determining degrees of freedom when applying Lagrangian formalism.
  • It is mentioned that the center of mass coordinate has two degrees of freedom (R, θ) and the relative coordinate has two degrees of freedom, although one angle remains unspecified.
  • Some participants agree that if the system is planar, four differential equations of motion should be derived from the Lagrangian.
  • There is confusion expressed regarding the interpretation of the quantities derived from the Euler-Lagrange equations, particularly in relation to the momentum of the center of mass and the other quantities.
  • One participant raises a question about the difference between the generalized momenta of the center of mass and the relative coordinate, as well as the reference point for the angular momentum of the relative coordinate.
  • A later reply suggests that the interpretation of the relative coordinate depends on how the coordinates were introduced, indicating that it could represent the distance from one mass to the center of mass.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty and confusion regarding the specific meanings of P, p(subscript r), and L, indicating that multiple competing views remain about their interpretations and roles in the equations of motion. The discussion does not reach a consensus on these points.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the interpretation of quantities may depend on the specific coordinate system used, and there is an acknowledgment of potential nonlinearities in the resulting equations of motion.

dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
I have been looking at the problem of 2 point masses connected by a spring in polar coordinates. The problem is solved using the center of mass coordinate R and the relative coordinate r where M=total mass and m=reduced mass. The Euler-Lagrange equations then give equations for P(a vector) and p(subscript r) and L(which i think is p subscript θ). But i don't understand what these 3 quantities represent ?
Is it motion about the origin or the center of mass ? Is it in the radial direction ? p subscript r normally is but this time r is the relative coordinate , not necessarily radial.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The very first thing to do when using Lagrangian formalism is to determine your degrees of freedom.

Then introduce coordinates that express those degrees of freedom most naturally.
 
The center of mass coordinate has 2 degrees of freedom (R , θ ) and the relative coordinate has 2 degrees of freedom ( r and some other angle, i don't know what this is)
 
If the system is confined to a plane, I agree. But is it?

Anyway, assuming it is planar, what do you not understand here?
 
If the system is planar, then you should obtain four differential equations of motion from forming the system Lagrangian and applying the Euler-Lagrange operator.
 
yes the system is planar but i don't understand what the quantities found by solving the E-L equations represent. I know what is the momentum of the center of mass but what are the others ?
 
You should get a system of four (probably nonlinear) ODEs which you can solve (most likely numerically) for your generalized coordinates as a function of time.

The Euler-Lagrange operator applied to the Lagrangian will give you an equation of motion. You can check your result by using another method, e.g. Newton, Hamilton, Kane, or Gibbs-Appell.
 
dyn said:
yes the system is planar but i don't understand what the quantities found by solving the E-L equations represent. I know what is the momentum of the center of mass but what are the others ?

The quantities found from the E-L equations are the same quantities you used to compose the expressions for kinetic and potential energies for the Lagrangian function. If you do not understand what they are, then how did you obtain your Lagrangian?
 
I don't understand what the difference is between the generalised momentums of the centre of mass and the relative coordinate ? And what point is the angular momentum of the relative coordinate about ?
 
  • #10
These details depend on how exactly the coordinates were introduced. In one approach, the relative ##r## coordinate would be the distance from one mass to the centre of mass. And the relative ##\phi## coordinate would be the angle the mass-to-mass line makes with come fixed direction, say the vertical if the plane of motion is vertical, or the North-South line if the plane is horizontal.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
950
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K