What causes the squiggly orbit and how can it be eliminated?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mrjoe2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2-body Orbit Systems
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the complexities of three-body orbital dynamics, specifically addressing the squiggly orbits observed when a small third mass (K) orbits a binary system consisting of a sun-like object and a larger mass (L). The gravitational interactions between these bodies lead to perturbations that cause the elliptical orbit of K to appear distorted. The key takeaway is that when plotting orbits, centering on the barycenter of the system rather than the central star eliminates the visual distortion of the orbit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kepler's laws of planetary motion
  • Familiarity with gravitational interactions in multi-body systems
  • Knowledge of barycentric coordinates and their application in orbital mechanics
  • Basic principles of orbital dynamics and perturbation theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "three-body problem in celestial mechanics" for deeper insights into complex gravitational interactions
  • Explore "barycentric coordinates" to understand their role in simplifying orbital calculations
  • Learn about "orbital perturbation theory" to analyze the effects of additional masses on orbits
  • Investigate simulation tools like "Orbit Simulator" to visualize and analyze multi-body systems
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of celestial mechanics who are interested in understanding the dynamics of multi-body systems and the effects of gravitational interactions on orbital paths.

mrjoe2
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Well, my biggest q, isn't exactly about the 2-body, it's more like 3-body I guess.
What I'm trying to accomplish here is to say that we can not ignore a small third mass orbiting around a sun-like object.

I have the Sun-Like Object and another object (L) orbiting around it, now L is following an ellipse shape because the center Sun object is having a gravitation pull on m1. Now a smaller object (K) further away is also being affected by the gravitational pull by the Sun object but even L has a gravitational pull on K, so that K object is (having 2 gravitational pulls effecting it)?
And this cuases turbulation which is why the ellipse is squiggly?
Does this make any sense or am I to ambiguous?

Another question is: Consider kepler's first law. The planets orbit is an eiplse since it's binding energy is near 0 but not equal to 0. As planets orbit around a sun we can see that the distance from the sun on the planet's position is not constant. Can it be constan is my question? When, how?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Replace m1 with L.
mrjoe2 said:
Well, my biggest q, isn't exactly about the 2-body, it's more like 3-body I guess.
What I'm trying to accomplish here is to say that we can not ignore a small third mass orbiting around a sun-like object.

I have the Sun-Like Object and another object (L) orbiting around it, now L is following an ellipse shape because the center Sun object is having a gravitation pull on m1. Now a smaller object (K) further away is also being affected by the gravitational pull by the Sun object but even L has a gravitational pull on K, so that K object is (having 2 gravitational pulls effecting it)?
And this cuases turbulation which is why the ellipse is squiggly?
Does this make any sense or am I to ambiguous?

Another question is: Consider kepler's first law. The planets orbit is an eiplse since it's binding energy is near 0 but not equal to 0. As planets orbit around a sun we can see that the distance from the sun on the planet's position is not constant. Can it be constan is my question? When, how?
 
There are already enough complications with one body in orbit, since both bodies will eventually meet due to gravitational radiation.
Add a third and the problem space is exploding.
 
Last edited:
The reason for your "squiggly ellipse" is because you're probably displaying your orbit with the central star locked to the middle of your diagram, when in reality, it is not still. It orbits the barycenter of the AB pair. If you plot your orbits with respect to the barycenter, the squigglies should go away.

Here is an example. This is a screen shot of a 1 solar mass star being orbited by a 0.5 solar mass star from a distance of 0.1 AU and an eccentricity of 0.2. A more distant massless test particle orbits the pair. With the central star locked in place in the plot, the distant object has the squiggles. But when the plot is centered on the barycenter of the AB pair, it does not:

http://orbitsimulator.com/PF/bc.GIF
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K