2-body scattering and Mandelstam Variables

  • #1
Pizza Pasta physics
1
0

Homework Statement


In a 2-body scattering event, A + B → C + D, it is convenient to introduce the Mandelstam variables,
s ≡ −(PA + PB)2 ,
t ≡ −(PA − PC) 2 ,
u ≡ −(PA − PD) 2 ,
where PA,...,D are the 4-momenta of the particles A, . . . , D respectively, (· · ·) 2 = (· · ·) · (· · ·) denotes a scalar product, and we are using natural units in this problem. The Mandelstam variables are useful in theoretical calculations because they are invariant under Lorentz transformation.

Demonstrate that in the centre of mass frame of A and B, the total CM energy, i.e., Etotal ≡ EA +EB = EC + ED , is equal to √ s.

Homework Equations


s + t + u = mA2 + mB2 + mC2 + mD2 (I had to show this before which I did, not sure if its relevant or not).
PA = -PB (due to being in a CM frame)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Using the scalar product notation for s, I managed to reduce s to -(EA + EB) however I still can't take the square root to show √ s = EA + EB due to the pesky negative sign.

Apart from me doing something wrong with my algebra, I was wondering if the given Mandelstam variables are correct. From all the secondary sources I've looked at none give them with the negative signs.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
20,004
10,658
This depends on whether or not you use a +--- or -+++ signature on your metric. Most particle physicists use +--- and it seems like your source does not. Check what convention is used.
 

Suggested for: 2-body scattering and Mandelstam Variables

Replies
13
Views
433
Replies
31
Views
473
Replies
5
Views
380
Replies
1
Views
675
Replies
16
Views
563
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
11
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
291
Replies
3
Views
442
Replies
3
Views
445
Top