1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

2-body scattering and Mandelstam Variables

  1. May 24, 2017 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    In a 2-body scattering event, A + B → C + D, it is convenient to introduce the Mandelstam variables,
    s ≡ −(PA + PB)2 ,
    t ≡ −(PA − PC) 2 ,
    u ≡ −(PA − PD) 2 ,
    where PA,...,D are the 4-momenta of the particles A, . . . , D respectively, (· · ·) 2 = (· · ·) · (· · ·) denotes a scalar product, and we are using natural units in this problem. The Mandelstam variables are useful in theoretical calculations because they are invariant under Lorentz transformation.

    Demonstrate that in the centre of mass frame of A and B, the total CM energy, i.e., Etotal ≡ EA +EB = EC + ED , is equal to √ s.
    2. Relevant equations
    s + t + u = mA2 + mB2 + mC2 + mD2 (I had to show this before which I did, not sure if its relevant or not).
    PA = -PB (due to being in a CM frame)
    3. The attempt at a solution

    Using the scalar product notation for s, I managed to reduce s to -(EA + EB) however I still can't take the square root to show √ s = EA + EB due to the pesky negative sign.

    Apart from me doing something wrong with my algebra, I was wondering if the given Mandelstam variables are correct. From all the secondary sources I've looked at none give them with the negative signs.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 25, 2017 #2

    Orodruin

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    This depends on whether or not you use a +--- or -+++ signature on your metric. Most particle physicists use +--- and it seems like your source does not. Check what convention is used.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: 2-body scattering and Mandelstam Variables
  1. 2 variables! (Replies: 5)

Loading...