Greetings--a few further questions and thoughts from Peskin and Schroeder(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. (I'll do my best to keep the discussion self-contained, but I'll provide references as well.)

Is there an easy way to produce Feynman diagrams in LaTeX? (Maybe Daniel has a trick? ) In the mean while I'll resort to describing them.

In section 5.4 (p.155-157) P&S introduce the principle of crossing symmetry and Mandelstam variables and proceed to use these tricks to easily compuse the squared, spin-avereaged amplitude for [tex]e^-\mu^- \rightarrow e^-\mu^-[/tex] by exploiting a previous result for [tex]e^+e^- \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^-[/tex].

P&S say (p. 156) "it is conventional to define [tex]t[/tex] as the squared difference of the initial and final momenta of the most similar particles."

- First of all, is there some standard criteria for what constitutes a "similar" particle? i.e. are an electron and a positron more similar than an electron and a muon (charge versus family)?

This seems to lead to some ambiguity in the example:

Following P&S's notation for [tex]e^+e^- \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^-[/tex] as follows: the momentum of the incoming [tex]e^-[/tex] is [tex]p[/tex] and incoming [tex]e^+[/tex] is [tex]p'[/tex], while the momentum of the outgoing [tex]\mu-[/tex] is [tex]k[/tex] and outgoing [tex]\mu^+[/tex] is [tex]k'[/tex]. (That is, particles are unprimed while antiparticles are primed and incoming particles are labelled with [tex]p[/tex], outgoing particles are labelled with [tex]k[/tex]). ((See, that wasn't too hard to visualize, was it? ))

The result (p. 156, eq. 5.70) is: [tex]\frac{1}{4}\sum_{spins}|M|^2 = \frac{8e^4}{s^2}\left[ \left( \frac{t}{2} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{u}{2} \right)^2\right][/tex]

Now we use this result to compute the corresponding value for [tex]e^-\mu^- \rightarrow e^-\mu^-[/tex]. We first turn the photon propagator sideways (which doesn't change the topology or physics). Then we apply crossing symmetry twice: (1) the incoming [tex]e^+[/tex] with momentum [tex]p'[/tex] becomes an outgoing [tex]e^-[/tex] with momentum [tex]-p'[/tex], (2) the outgoing [tex]\mu^+[/tex] with momentum [tex]k'[/tex] becomes an incoming [tex]\mu^-[/tex] with momentum [tex]-k'[/tex].

Let us call the corresponding Mandelstam variables for this process: [tex]\~{s}, \~{t}, \~{u}[/tex] to avoid confusion with the Mandelstam variables for [tex]e^+e^- \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^-[/tex], which we write without squigglies.

Now all that remains to be done is to figure out what the old Mandelstam variables turn into in terms of the new Mandelstam variables after we employ crossing symmetry: [tex]p', k' \rightarrow -p', -k'[/tex].

First of all, [tex]s=(p+p')^2 = (k+k')^2 \rightarrow (p-p')^2 = (k-k')^2 = \~{t} [/tex], which is written out explicitly at the bottom of page 156. However, the text says that [tex]t \rightarrow \~{s}, u\rightarrow \~{u}[/tex], which appears to be a typo--or perhaps I'm confused.

- I would think that [tex]t=(k-p)^2=(k'-p')^2 \rightarrow (k-p)^2=(k'-p')^2=\~{u}[/tex] and [tex]u=(k'-p)^2=(k-p')^2 \rightarrow (p+k')^2 = (k+p')^2 = \~s[/tex]. Is this correct? (Either way yields the same result for the spin-averaged amplitude-squared.)

Ok, now an unrelated question: in chapter 5.5 P&S discuss Compton Scattering and introduce photon polarization sums. Their goal is to motivate the replacement [tex]\sum_{polarizations} \epsilon^*_\mu \epsilon_\nu \rightarrow -g_{\mu \nu}[/tex]. They define [tex]M^\mu(k)[/tex] as the part of the total amplitude that does not depend on [tex]\epsilon^*_\mu[/tex] such that [tex]M(k)=M^\mu(k)\epsilon^*_\mu(k)[/tex].

On p. 160, however, I am confused by their motivation for the form of this [tex]M^\mu(k)[/tex]: "Now recall from Chapter 4 that external photons are created by the interaction term [tex]\int d^4x e j^\mu A_\mu[/tex], where [tex]j^\mu = \overline{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi[/tex] is the Dirac vector current. Therefore we expect M to be given by the matrix element of the Heisenberg field [tex]j^\mu[/tex]:"

[tex]M^\mu(k)=\int d^4xe^{ik\cdot x} \langle f | j^\mu (x) i| \rangle[/tex]

Where the sum is over the inital and final states of all particles except the photon in question.

- How are external photons created from the interaction term [tex]\int d^4x e j^\mu A_\mu[/tex] and how does this motivate the form for [tex]M^\mu(k)[/tex]: ?

Thanks very much,

Flip

easily bewildered student

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Crossing Symmetry and Mandelstam Variables; and (unrelated) external photons

Loading...

Similar Threads for Crossing Symmetry Mandelstam |
---|

B Relation between spin and symmetry of wave function |

B Question about Unitary Operators and symmetry |

I Gauge Symmetry |

A Why do space translations satisfy the Wigner's Theorem? |

I Why this system has a rotational symmetry in Dirac equation? |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**