Deriving formula for final velocity in 2 repelling bodies

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around predicting the final velocities of two magnetic masses, m1 and m2, that repel each other over a distance s with a force f. The original poster outlines initial conditions, including both masses starting at rest and the direction of motion being defined for the velocities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of kinematic equations to derive final velocities, questioning the assumptions about the forces and distances involved. There is discussion about the implications of equal masses and the nature of the force as a function of distance. Some participants raise concerns about the validity of the derived equations under certain conditions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided insights into the nature of the forces and the work-energy principle, while others question the assumptions made in the original setup. There is no explicit consensus on the approach or the validity of the equations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may not fit traditional homework criteria due to its complexity. There are also concerns about the implications of equal masses on the derived formulas and the assumptions regarding the force being constant or a function of distance.

dE_logics
Messages
742
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider 2 magnetic masses, m1 and m2; these 2 repel each other for a distance s with force f (relative to each other)...which applies from m1 to m2.

Predict final velocity of m1 and m2.

Assume final distance to be v1 and v2

Assume the 2 masses at rest initially.

Take any values pointing to the direction of motion of m1 as positive; that is the final velocity of m1 will be positive and m2 will be negative.

So the f by the above definition will be negative (when real world values are taken).



Homework Equations



2as = v^2 - u^2; this might be used...I used it



The Attempt at a Solution



Using standard formula 2as = v^2 – u^2

Its to be noted that the formula is applicable only when the formula from where the normal reaction is derived is stationary with respect to the frame of the observer, so the distance df that the body and mass covers is partially due to the distance traveled by m1 and partially due to the the distance that the body travels (this will be observed by the observer).

So the actual distance that the mass travels (while accelerating) is d1, and that for the body is d2 (new variables assumed, we do not know this value), however the sum of d1 and d2 is equal to the total distance traveled will be equal to the distance for which the force applies (s).

Also the distance traveled by each the mass and the body is an inverse and direct function of mass.

Here a1 (acceleration on m1) = -f/m1

a2 (acceleration on m2) = f/m2

By 2as = v^2 – u^2 -

2*a2*d2 = v2^2...1

2*a1*d1 = v1^2...2

-d2 + d1 = s...3 (this is done cause the real value of d2 will be negative, following the coordinate system)

d1/d2 = m2/m1...4 (as stated before, distance traveled is a direct and inverse function of mass).

There are 4 equation and 4 unknown.

Since the formula needs to be derived, they cannot be solved simultaneously.

Making d2 the subject from equation 4 -

(d1*m1)/m2 = d2

Substituting in equation 3 -

-((d1*m1)/m2) + d1 = s

-d1((m1)/m2) - 1) = s

-d1((m1-m2)/m2) = s

d1 = -s*m2/(m1-m2)

Substituting above value of d1 in equation 2 -

2*a1*(-s*m2/(m1-m2)) = v1^2

From equation 4 making d1 the subject -

d1 = (d2*m2)/m1

Substituting value of d1 in equation 3 -

-d2 + ((d2*m2)/m1) = s

-d2(1 - (m2)/m1) = s

-d2((m1-m2)/m1) = s

d2 = (-s*m1)/(m1-m2)

Substituting value of d2 in equation 1

2*a2*((-s*m1)/(m1-m2)) = v2^2


Final equations -

2*a2*((-s*m1)/(m1-m2)) = v2^2
and
2*a1*(-s*m2/(m1-m2)) = v1^2

Putting real world values – f = -3000
m1 = 610
m2 = 10
s = 2
a2 = -300
a1 = 300/61

v2^2 = 1220....ok
v1^2 = -20/61.....the negativity needs to be removed

Squaring v1^2 = -20/61 (is then step OK?)

v1^4 = 400/3721.....ok
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this won't be called as a HW problem.
 
Predict final velocity under repulsion.

Consider 2 magnetic masses, m1 and m2; these 2 repel each other for a distance s with force f (relative to each other)...which applies from m1 to m2.

Predict final velocity of m1 and m2.

Assume final distance to be v1 and v2

Assume the 2 masses at rest initially.

Take any values pointing to the direction of motion of m1 as positive; that is the final velocity of m1 will be positive and m2 will be negative.

So the f by the above definition will be negative (when real world values are taken).


This is not a HW problem...officially too, cause I think the solution is pretty complex in relation to a HW (no one answered it anyway in that section, so I put it here).
 
This formula won't work for both the mass being equal, m1-m2 will churn 0 in that case.
 


Assume they are initially at rest.

They repel each other for a distance s with force f = f(d), where d = s + a, a being the initial separation (perhaps zero).

W = S f ds, and W = KE_f - KE_i = KE_f - 0 = (1/2) m v^2, where v is the final velocity.

Note that m1 will have v > 0, and m2 will have v < 0, but |v| is the same for both, by symmetry.

Does that make sense? Am I just totally wrong?
 


csprof2000 said:
f = f(d)

Ok...assume force not to be a function of distance...just assume that to make things simple.

d = s + a, a being the initial separation (perhaps zero).

Why has s been added to a?...I mean the distance traveled by both the bodies should be less than s.

Can you pls define the variables? :smile:
 
Problem solved....
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K