2D Kinematics; Flying Saucer observed with two velocities

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in 2D kinematics involving a flying saucer observed with two different velocities and the need to determine its acceleration. The original poster presents a scenario where the saucer's position and velocities are provided, but lacks information on the time elapsed between the observations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate the problem to Galilean transformation of velocity, questioning how to find acceleration without time information. Some participants suggest using distance information along with the equations of motion to derive acceleration, while others express confusion about the applicability of certain equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, with some suggesting that the lack of time information complicates the determination of acceleration. There is an acknowledgment of the possibility of using distance to create equations with unknowns, but uncertainty remains regarding the correct application of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted absence of time data, which is critical for calculating acceleration. Participants are also discussing the implications of assuming constant acceleration and the relevance of the distance between the two observed positions.

oddjobmj
Messages
305
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A flying saucer maneuvering with constant acceleration is observed with the positions and velocities shown below:

http://imgur.com/gq1g0

What is the saucer's acceleration?

*note: I created the image in paint and I did forget to label the vectors. The one starting at the origin is '1' and the second vector is '2'.


Homework Equations


EDIT:
a(vector)=lim (as delta t approaches 0) delta v(vector)/delta t(vector)

That equals:
dv(vector)/dt

(dvx/dt)i + (vy/dt)j = a(vector)

The Attempt at a Solution


[STRIKE]The portion of the chapter that most closely relates to this, as far as I can see, is the bit on Galilean transformation of velocity. 'If we know an object's velocity measured in one reference frame, we can transform it into the velocity that would be measured by an experimenter in a different reference frame.'

That method simply converts between two reference points which is how I interpret the two different vectors. Same object w/ different reference points yields two different vectors for velocity.

The issue here is that I don't know how to find acceleration of which I understand to be a change in velocity over a change in time. Having not been provided any information on time elapsed I cannot figure out how to find acceleration. I have the answer in the back of the book and see that it's not some trick where it is not accelerating or the acceleration is 0.[/STRIKE]

None of that applies >_< The section this points to suggests you can combine two vectors into one and then somehow come up with instantaneous velocity but it doesn't provide any examples of how to do it; just images. I'm checking google to figure it out but am having a hard time coming up with a reasonable search.

Thank you!
~Odd
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like you need to know the time that elapses between the first velocity measurement and the second. Then you could use
a = Δv/Δt in each dimension to find the components of acceleration.

We don't know time, but we do also have distance info. If you assume constant acceleration, then in each dimension you have an a = Δv/Δt equation with unknowns t and a, plus a d=Vi*t +½at² equation with unknowns t and a. Hey, that gives you 2 equations with two unknowns so you can find the acceleration!
Remember to do all that for both x and y directions.
 
I edited my original post.

I appreciate your help but I don't see how that would help me. The equation d=Vi*t +½at² is familiar but never used in this chapter/section. Shouldn't d=0? If so, it doesn't work out to anything useful. If it equals the only other attainable distance, 1000sqrt(5) (from the overall chance in position between point 1 and 2) it still doesn't help me out.

I must be missing something here because this problem is, I'm sure, very simple.
 
On the graph, you can see that vector 1 is at x=0, while vector 2 is at x=2000. So the horizontal distance from time 1 to time 2 is 2000 m.
I worked out the horizontal acceleration and it comes to about 10 m/s².

That velocity formula is the very basic accelerated motion formula from a first high school physics course. It applies to any situation where there is constant acceleration. I think that is a reasonable assumption here because there likely are an infinite number of solutions with varying acceleration.

If you wish to do the x and y parts together, you could use the same formulas with your i and j unit vectors.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K