How do I find the metric tensor for an arbitrary coordinate system?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MalleusScientiarum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d Laplacian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding the metric tensor for arbitrary coordinate systems, specifically in the context of the Laplacian operator. The Laplacian is defined as Δ = gijij, where i,j=1,2, and simplifies to Δ = gijij when Christoffel symbols are zero. In Cartesian coordinates, the Laplacian takes the form ∂²/∂x² + ∂²/∂y². The discussion also touches on the relationship between the Laplacian, harmonic functions, and heat flow, emphasizing the operator's invariance under rigid motions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry concepts, including metric tensors and the Laplacian operator.
  • Familiarity with coordinate systems, particularly Cartesian and polar coordinates.
  • Knowledge of harmonic functions and their applications in cohomology.
  • Basic principles of heat diffusion equations in mathematical physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the metric tensor in various coordinate systems, focusing on examples in polar and cylindrical coordinates.
  • Learn about the properties of the Laplacian operator in different geometrical contexts.
  • Explore the de Rham theorem and its implications for harmonic forms and cohomology classes.
  • Investigate the applications of the Laplacian in solving the heat-diffusion equation.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of differential geometry who are interested in the applications of the Laplacian operator, metric tensors, and harmonic functions in various coordinate systems.

MalleusScientiarum
Does anybody out there know what the Laplacian is for two dimensions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Laplacian is the trace of the Hessian operator and is undoubtedly given by

\Delta =g^{ij}\nabla_{i}\nabla_{j}

,where i,j=1,2. Incidentally, for a manifold on which Christoffel's symbols are 0, it reduces to the standard form

\Delta=g^{ij}\partial_{i}\partial_{j}

Daniel.
 
That is probably one of the most complicated answers to a simple question I've ever seen.
 
It depends upon the coordinate system. Dextercioby gave the general formula for any coordinate system, thereby making it, as MalleusScientarum said, "one of the most complicated answers to a simple question I've ever seen"!

In Cartesian coordinates it is \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+ \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}.

By the way, the Laplacian is the simplest differential operator that is "invarient under rigid motions".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lets see now, isn't the laplacian the differential operator that vanishes on harmonic functions? if so, wouldn't that say it is the one that governs steady state heat flow? and characterizes the real and imaginary parts of holomorphic functions?


harmonic forms on the other hand are very sueful in discussing cohomology. the de rham theorem says that every cohomology class on a compact oriented? diff manifold can be represented by a smooth differential form, but there is no uniqueness.

by imposing a metric and hence defining a laplacian, one can define harmonic foirms and thewn there is a unique harminic representative for each cohomology class.

e.g. on an elliptic curve, formed as a quotient of the complex numbers by a lattice, one has the natural harmonic basis dz and "dzbar".
 
Last edited:
yes that stuff about harmonic & holomorphic functions sounds right. i don't know anything about heat flow though.
 
yes, the heat-diffusion equation is:

T_p = k\Delta T

where in cartesian coordinates T_p is the change in temperature at the point p

T(t,x,y,z) and p: (x,y,z)


T_p = k(\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial ^2 T}{\partial z^2})
 
Apologies, I guess I should specify for polar coordinates.
 
  • #10
That's ultimately what I decided to do, but it always makes me nervous when I do something like that without knowing what mathematical reasoning I could use to justify it. As for the original answer, how would one find the metric tensor for an arbitrary coordinate system? Examples would be greatly appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
843
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
885
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K