2nd Order Differential Equation with Improved Euler Method (Heun's)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a second-order differential equation, specifically a Mass-Spring-Damper equation, using the Improved Euler Method (Heun's). The equation is converted into a system of first-order differential equations, leading to the formulation of both forward and Improved Euler solutions. The user seeks clarification on whether the force term in the Improved Euler solution should be updated to F_{n+1}. The response confirms that the force should indeed be F_{n+1} in the equation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the Improved Euler method for accurate results.
Fluidman117
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I would like to solve a 2nd Order Differential Equation using the Improved Euler Method. The 2nd ODE is a Mass-Spring-Damper equation. I tried coming up with an solution for the Improved Euler Method, but not entirely sure. Can you help me and have a look if this is correct?
This solution assumes that inital conditions for x and u are known.

Homework Equations


Forced Mass-Spring-Damper equation:

m\ddot{x} + b\dot{x}+kx = F


The Attempt at a Solution



Converting the equation to a pair of first order differential equations:
u=\dot{x}
\dot{u}=\ddot{x}

And thus we have:
\dot{u}=\frac{1}{m}\left[F-bu-kx\right]

The forward Euler solution would result in:
x_{n+1}=x_{n}+dt*u_{n}
u_{n+1}=u_{n}+dt*\dot{u_{n}}=u_{n}+dt*\frac{1}{m}\left[F_{n}-bu_{n}-kx_{n}\right]

And the Improved Euler solution would be:
x_{n+1}=x_{n}+dt*u_{n}
u_{n+1}=u_{n}+dt*\dot{u_{n}}=u_{n}+\frac{dt}{2} \left[ \frac{1}{m} \left[F_{n}-bu_{n}-kx_{n}\right]+\frac{1}{m}\left[F_{n+1}-bu_{n+1}-kx_{n+1}\right] \right]

In the last equation, does the last F needs to be F_{n+1} like I have it?

Thanks a bunch, if you have time to have a look at it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your improved Euler solution looks fine to me. You indeed want the 'n+1'.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
860
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K