MHB *3 coordinates of parallelogram STUV

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the coordinates of point V in parallelogram STUV, given the coordinates of points S, T, and U. The vector from S to T is calculated as $\vec{ST} = \pmatrix{9 \\ 9}$, leading to the determination of V's coordinates as (-4, 6). The equation of line UV is established as $y = x + 10$, and the value of $\lambda$ is derived from the equations $x = -4 - 9\lambda$ and $y = 6 - 9\lambda$. Ultimately, the value of $\lambda$ is found to be $-\frac{5}{9}$.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
View attachment 1233

(a) $\vec{ST} = \pmatrix{9 \\ 9}$
so $V=(5,15)-(9,9)=(-4,6)$

(b) $UV = \pmatrix{-4,6}-\lambda \pmatrix{9,9}$

(c) eq of line $UV$ is $y=x+10$ so from position vector
$\pmatrix{1 \\11}$ we have $11=1+10$

didn't know how to find the value of $\lambda$

(d) ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have \displaystyle \begin{align*} x = -4 - 9\lambda \end{align*} and \displaystyle \begin{align*} y = 6 - 9\lambda \end{align*}, so surely if you have the point \displaystyle \begin{align*} (x, y) = (1, 11) \end{align*} you can find \displaystyle \begin{align*} \lambda \end{align*}...
 
For d) i), you can easily apply the distance formula in elementary geometry. You should get
$$\sqrt{(a-1)^2+(17-11)^2}=2\sqrt{13}$$
From that point it's just algebra.
For ii), use this formula involving vector dot products:
$$\theta_{ab}=\arccos\frac{a\cdot b}{\mid \mid a\mid \mid \mid \mid b\mid \mid }$$

(Bandit)
 
Last edited:
Hello, karush!

\text{20. Three of the coordinates of parallelogram }STUV
. . . .\text{are: }\:S(\text{-}2,\text{-}2),\:T(7,7),\:U(5,15)

\text{(a) Find the vector }\vec{ST}\text{ and hence the coordinates of }V.
The sketch locates point V.
Code:
                  |       (5,15)
                  |       U o
                  |       .   *
                  |     .       * (7.7)
                  |   .           o T
                  | .           * :
                  .           *   :
                . |         *     :
              .   |       *       :
            .     |     *         :-9
          .       |   *           :
      V o         | *             :
    ------.-------*---------------:----
            .   * |               :
            S o - | - - - - - - - *
           (-2,-2)|    -9
Going from T to S, we move down 9 and left 9.

Doing the same from U we arrive at V(-4,6).
 
soroban said:
Hello, karush!


The sketch locates point V.
Code:
                  |       (5,15)
                  |       U o
                  |       .   *
                  |     .       * (7.7)
                  |   .           o T
                  | .           * :
                  .           *   :
                . |         *     :
              .   |       *       :
            .     |     *         :-9
          .       |   *           :
      V o         | *             :
    ------.-------*---------------:----
            .   * |               :
            S o - | - - - - - - - *
           (-2,-2)|    -9
Going from T to S, we move down 9 and left 9.

Doing the same from U we arrive at V(-4,6).

As impressive as your coding skills are, I have to ask, didn't the OP already do all of this?
 
Prove It said:
You have \displaystyle \begin{align*} x = -4 - 9\lambda \end{align*} and \displaystyle \begin{align*} y = 6 - 9\lambda \end{align*}, so surely if you have the point \displaystyle \begin{align*} (x, y) = (1, 11) \end{align*} you can find \displaystyle \begin{align*} \lambda \end{align*}...

OK from this I get $$\lambda = -\frac{5}{9}$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top