MHB 3 forces, 5N,6N and 7N ac on a particle which remains in a state of equilibrium.

AI Thread Summary
Three forces of 5N, 6N, and 7N act on a particle in equilibrium, requiring the resultant force to be zero. The forces are defined in a two-dimensional plane, with the largest force (7N) assumed to act along the positive x-axis. Equations are established to relate the components of the forces, leading to a system of four equations with four unknowns. The discussion suggests using the dot product to find the angle between the 5N and 6N forces by leveraging known magnitudes and relationships among the vectors. This approach aims to calculate the angle based on the established vector relationships.
JessiMen
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
3 forces, 5N,6N and 7N act on a particle which remains in a state of equilibrium. What is the angle between the 5N and 6N force?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm going to assume the 3 forces all act within the same plane. And so, I would choose one of the forces to act along the $x$-axis in the positive direction (I'll choose the one with the largest magnitude so our unknowns involve the vectors in question), and I would make the following definitions:

$$F_1=\langle x_1,y_1 \rangle$$ where $$\left|F_1\right|=5$$

$$F_2=\langle x_2,y_2 \rangle$$ where $$\left|F_2\right|=6$$

$$F_3=\langle 7,0 \rangle$$

Next, let the resultant force be:

$$F_R=F_1+F_2+F_3=\langle 0,0 \rangle$$

And so we obtain:

$$x_1+x_2+7=0$$

$$y_1+y_2=0$$

$$x_1^2+y_1^2=5^2$$

$$x_2^2+y_2^2=6^2$$

We have 4 equations in 4 unknowns...can you proceed?
 
Here is an idea using dot product. I call the vectors $a$, $b$ and $c$ with $|a|=7$.
\[
b\cdot c=\frac12((b+c)\cdot(b+c)-b\cdot b-c\cdot c)
\]
Now use the facts that $b+c=-a$ and that $a\cdot a$, $b\cdot b$ and $c\cdot c$ are known to find $b\cdot c$ and therefore the angle between $b$ and $c$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top