Can 3 forces of 9N, 4N, and 6N be in equilibrium?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a scenario involving three forces of 4N, 6N, and 9N acting on a mass of 3kg, questioning whether these forces can be in equilibrium. The original poster expresses confusion about the conditions necessary for equilibrium, particularly due to the lack of specified directions or angles for the forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the possibility of the 4N and 6N forces combining to counteract the 9N force, questioning the resultant forces based on different configurations (same direction, opposite directions, or at angles).

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into how the forces might be arranged to achieve equilibrium, suggesting the use of diagrams and equations. There is recognition that the angles between the forces are crucial to determining their resultant. However, there is no explicit consensus on a definitive approach or solution at this stage.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of specific directional information and angles in the problem statement, which is central to understanding the forces' interactions. The discussion reflects a mix of familiarity with the concepts and varying levels of experience with force problems.

MattDutra123
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mass of 3kg is acted upon by three forces of 4.0 N, 6.0N, and 9.0N and is in equilibrium. The 9N force is suddenly removed. Determine the acceleration of the mass.

Homework Equations


F=ma.

The Attempt at a Solution


My main problem with this question is that I cannot think of any situation in which these three forces would be in equilibrium. The question does not specify in which direction the forces are in or any angles (in the case of an inclined plane). How can these forces possibly be in equilibrium?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF.

Well, 4+6=10 > 9, so it should be possible. Just think of ways that the sum of the x-components and the sum of the y-components can both be zero. Draw a diagram and write the two equations, and see if you can solve for the relevant angles... Please show us your sketch (use the UPLOAD button) and write out your equations. Thank you. :smile:
 
You could think of it in terms of the 4 and the 6 acting together to cancel out the 9. Is that possible?

Suppose the 4 N and the 6 N act together in the same direction. What is their resultant force? What happens if you use that force to oppose the 9 N force?
Suppose the 4 N and the 6 N act in directly opposite directions. What is their resultant force? What happens if you use that force to oppose the 9 N force?
If the 4 N and 6 N are at an angle relative to each other, the situation will be in between those two situations.
 
You can the law of cosines to compute what angle the 4N and 6N need to be relative to each other to make a resultant of 9N.
 
Charles Link said:
You can the law of cosines to compute what angle the 4N and 6N need to be relative to each other to make a resultant of 9N.
Just to point out that this is not necessary to solve the problem.
MattDutra123 said:
The question does not specify in which direction the forces are in or any angles (in the case of an inclined plane).
The main thing, as has been pointed out is that the forces can be in equilibrium given appropriate angles between them. What does this tell you about the resultant of the 4 N and 6 N forces?
 
Are you familiar with a "triangle of forces" in equilibrium? Can you draw a triangle with sides of those lengths?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MattDutra123, Charles Link and berkeman
You are thinking too hard. If the system is in equilibrium, then a = 0. You also know F = 0 and F is the sum of the forces. So if you remove one force you should be able to calculate the new sum of forces and therefore the acceleration.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MattDutra123
I've never studied forces beyond high school, so I've never encountered problems like this but, unless I miss my guess, this seems to require nothing more than basic arithmetic.
 
I think @haruspex has the best answer for this problem in post 6.
 
  • #10
Eric Bretschneider said:
You are thinking too hard. If the system is in equilibrium, then a = 0. You also know F = 0 and F is the sum of the forces. So if you remove one force you should be able to calculate the new sum of forces and therefore the acceleration.
That is the neatest way to solve the given problem, yes, but the OP's question in the forum is a little different.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K