1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

30FPS displayed on a 200Hz monitor

  1. Mar 4, 2015 #1
    Hello!

    I have a PAL TV, and that means it is best for footage of 25fps and 50fps
    The TV's refresh rate is 200Hz



    Well, my questions are:
    What happens if I play an NTSC file on the TV? (≈30fps), since it doesn't go well with 200Hz much (isn't a multiple)...
    • I thought about how would the TV display such files, assuming and hoping that no frames are dropped.
    • I thought that if you copy a frame 7 times at 200Hz it is approximately 28fps, and if you copy a frame 6 times, it is approximately 33fps.
    • Since the average of them is about 30.95fps, it quite irritates me, as I tend to be quite perfectionist...
    • I wanted to calculate how much frames to play at 33fps and how much frames to play at 28fps (overall in a second) to achieve the closest result to 30fps, again, without dropping frames.

    I've made a sort of a assumption, which I have no idea if right or even close to reality, since my knowledge at math is quite basic.

    Here is the link to all the calculations I attempted:
    desmos.com/calculator/76jnihypub

    I hope it is understandable enough, and since I have a tendency to confuse between cycle time and frequency, I cannot tell if what I've done makes any sense, it could be absolute nonesense...

    If it is not even close, then please, I would like if someone could enlighten me and show me how should this be done.


    And as a side question, if anyone is familiar with this, what do TVs with various refresh rates actually do when given files whose frame rates don't have a common divisor with the Hz of the monitor?



    Thank you very much!
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 4, 2015
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 4, 2015 #2

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2017 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Why so complicated? Let a fraction p of images been shown for 6 frames, the other for 7 frames.
    Then the average number of frames per image is 6+p which means the average time of an image is (6+p)/200 seconds. This should be the same as 1/30 second, therefore 1/30 = (6+p)/200. And this has a nice simple solution.
    I don't know if monitors actually do this (you can get a better (more fluent) result if you mix the two images).
     
  4. Mar 4, 2015 #3
    B1%7D%7B30%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7Bp+6%7D%7B200%7D%5C%3B%5Crightarrow%5C%3Bp%3D%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D.gif


    Sorry if this is a silly question, but what exactly does p stand for?
    Do I have to do the same thing with (p+7)/200?
    If yes what should I do after, and what in conclusion is the best average frame rate?
     
  5. Mar 4, 2015 #4

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2017 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    I don't see where you would get (p+7)/200 from. The average number of frames won't exceed 7.

    p=2/3 suggests to use 2 images for 7 frames and 1 for 6 frames. 3 images in 20 frames, or 30 images in 200 frames, which directly matches your frame rates.
     
  6. Mar 4, 2015 #5
    Wait so this is the method you mentioned that mixes the images?
     
  7. Mar 5, 2015 #6

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2017 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    No. What I meant with "mixing" is something like this, but on a shorter timescale.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: 30FPS displayed on a 200Hz monitor
  1. Displaying factorials (Replies: 2)

  2. How to display LaTex (Replies: 2)

Loading...