MHB 311.1.5.17 geometric description

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometric
Click For Summary
The solution set of the given system of equations is geometrically described as the single point at the origin (0,0,0). The reduced row echelon form indicates that the system has a unique solution, confirming that it is a "one to one" transformation. The determinant of the associated matrix is non-zero, further supporting the conclusion of a unique solution. Therefore, the only vector mapped to the zero vector is the zero vector itself. This establishes that the geometric description of the solution set is simply the point at the origin.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{311.1.5.17}$
Give a geometric description of the solution set.

$\begin{array}{rrrrr}
-2x_1&+2x_2&+4x_3&=0\\
-4x_1&-4x_2&-8x_3&=0\\
&-3x_2&-3x_3&=0
\end{array}$
this can be written as
$\left[\begin{array}{rrr|rr}-2&2&4&0\\-4&-4&-8&0\\&-3&-3&0\end{array}\right]$

$\text{RREF}=\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \end{array} \right]$
ok I am not sure how you get a geometric description with everything going to zero
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the point (0,0,0)
 
Equivalently the matrix [math]\begin{bmatrix}-2 & 2 & 4 \\ -4 & -4 & 8 \\ 0 & -3 & -3\end{bmatrix}[/math] has determinant [math]\left|\begin{array}{ccc}-2 & 2 & 4 \\ -4 & -4 & 8 \\ 0 & -3 & -3 \end{array}\right|= 3\left|\begin{array}{cc}-2 & 4 \\ -4 & 8\end{array}\right|- 3\left|\begin{array}{cc}-2 & 2 \\ -4 & -4\end{array}\right|= 3(-16+ 16)- 3(8+ 8)= -3(16)= -48 [/math] which is not 0 so is a "one to one" transformation. The only vector that is mapped to the 0 vector is the 0 vector itself.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K