B 3700 Year Old Babylonian Tablet of Trigonometry Tables

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter jedishrfu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometry Year
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the recent translation of a 3700-year-old Babylonian tablet, which contains trigonometric tables and Pythagorean triples. Some participants express skepticism about the implications of this discovery for modern trigonometry, arguing that it does not significantly alter current mathematical practices. There is debate over the relevance of the tablet's content, with questions about whether the Pythagorean triples are the primary focus or merely a step in a larger problem. Additionally, participants seek more information on the translation and its historical significance. Overall, the conversation highlights differing views on the impact of ancient Babylonian mathematics on contemporary understanding.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes diogenesNY, jedishrfu, FactChecker and 1 other person
Office_Shredder said:
I think has no implications for how we should do trigonometry.
I do not understand your post. Why is this quote relevant to the historical observation?
 
Buzz Bloom said:
I do not understand your post. Why is this quote relevant to the historical observation?

Because the third paragraph of the original article is

This means it has great relevance for our modern world. Babylonian mathematics may have been out of fashion for more than 3,000 years, but it has possible practical applications in surveying, computer graphics and education. This is a rare example of the ancient world teaching us something new."
 
I didn't see the "translation" part. Is there a link to the translation of the tablet and what it means? Thanks.
 
The Wikipedia article does a good job of summarizing it

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plimpton_322

Basically it contains some Pythagorean triples. They are written as ratios so maybe they are intended to be considered as trig function values. There's an open question about whether the Pythagorean triples are even the end goal of the tablet, or if they're just an intermediate step in solving something that's broken off.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
230
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top