B 3700 Year Old Babylonian Tablet of Trigonometry Tables

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter jedishrfu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometry Year
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes diogenesNY, jedishrfu, FactChecker and 1 other person
Office_Shredder said:
I think has no implications for how we should do trigonometry.
I do not understand your post. Why is this quote relevant to the historical observation?
 
Buzz Bloom said:
I do not understand your post. Why is this quote relevant to the historical observation?

Because the third paragraph of the original article is

This means it has great relevance for our modern world. Babylonian mathematics may have been out of fashion for more than 3,000 years, but it has possible practical applications in surveying, computer graphics and education. This is a rare example of the ancient world teaching us something new."
 
I didn't see the "translation" part. Is there a link to the translation of the tablet and what it means? Thanks.
 
The Wikipedia article does a good job of summarizing it

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plimpton_322

Basically it contains some Pythagorean triples. They are written as ratios so maybe they are intended to be considered as trig function values. There's an open question about whether the Pythagorean triples are even the end goal of the tablet, or if they're just an intermediate step in solving something that's broken off.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
119
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top