3rd degree exponential polynomial

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the transcendental equation 2e3x - e2x - 2ex = 1 by substituting u = ex, which simplifies to the polynomial 2u3 - u2 - 2u + 1 = 0. Participants confirm that this polynomial has "nice" solutions, contrasting with the original equation's complexity. Additionally, the discussion touches on proving the identity Artanh(Sin(π/4)) = Ln(1 + √2) through algebraic manipulation of hyperbolic functions and logarithms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transcendental equations and their solutions.
  • Familiarity with hyperbolic functions, specifically Cosech and Coth.
  • Knowledge of logarithmic identities and properties.
  • Experience with polynomial equations and their roots.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the methods for solving transcendental equations, focusing on substitution techniques.
  • Learn about hyperbolic functions and their relationships with exponential functions.
  • Explore polynomial root-finding algorithms, such as the Rational Root Theorem.
  • Investigate logarithmic identities and their applications in proofs and simplifications.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in solving complex equations involving exponential and hyperbolic functions.

W3bbo
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] 3rd degree exponential polynomial

Homework Statement



Derived from the original question:

"Reduce to find x"

2e^{3x} - e^{2x} - 2e^x = 1

The Attempt at a Solution



Inspection fails, since the answer is transcendental. I have the answer from my CAS, but I can't figure it out myself.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you make the substitution u=e^x, then the equation reduces to 2u^3-u^2-2u-1=0. Can you solve this?
 
I haven't worked the thing out , but you might try letting u=e^x and try that.
What was the original question?
I'll play with it more here after we eat.
CC
 
cristo said:
If you make the substitution u=e^x, then the equation reduces to 2u^3-u^2-2u-1=0. Can you solve this?

No, that's my problem. :)
 
W3bbo said:
No, that's my problem. :)

Are you sure that's the right equation? It doesn't have "nice" solutions. What is the original question?
 
cristo said:
Are you sure that's the right equation? It doesn't have "nice" solutions. What is the original question?
It really doesn't, lol.
 
cristo said:
Are you sure that's the right equation? It doesn't have "nice" solutions. What is the original question?

The original question was "Find x, using the definitions of the hyperbolics in terms of exponentials"

...from this expression:

2 = {\mathop{\rm Cosech}\nolimits} \left( x \right) - 2{\mathop{\rm Coth}\nolimits} \left( x \right)

Here's my working so far, reducing down to the final polynomial:

\displaylines{<br /> {\mathop{\rm Cosech}\nolimits} \left( x \right) = {2 \over {e^x - e^{ - x} }} \cr <br /> {\mathop{\rm Coth}\nolimits} \left( x \right) = {{{\mathop{\rm Cosh}\nolimits} \left( x \right)} \over {{\mathop{\rm Sinh}\nolimits} \left( x \right)}} = {{{\textstyle{1 \over 2}}\left( {e^x + e^{ - x} } \right)} \over {{\textstyle{1 \over 2}}\left( {e^x - e^{ - x} } \right)}} = {{e^{2x} + 1} \over {e^{2x} - 1}} \cr}

\displaylines{<br /> 2 = {\mathop{\rm Cosech}\nolimits} \left( x \right) - 2{\mathop{\rm Coth}\nolimits} \left( x \right) \cr <br /> = {2 \over {e^x - e^{ - x} }} - 2\left( {{{e^{2x} + 1} \over {e^{2x} - 1}}} \right) \cr <br /> 1 = {1 \over {e^x - e^{ - x} }} - {{e^{2x} + 1} \over {e^{2x} - 1}} \cr <br /> = {{e^{2x} - 1} \over {\left( {e^x - e^{ - x} } \right)\left( {e^{2x} - 1} \right)}} - \left( {{{e^{2x} + 1} \over {e^{2x} - 1}} \times {{e^x - e^{ - x} } \over {e^x - e^{ - x} }}} \right) \cr <br /> = {{e^{2x} - 1} \over {e^{3x} - 2e^x + e^{ - x} }} - {{e^{3x} - e^{ - x} } \over {e^{3x} - 2e^x + e^{ - x} }} \cr <br /> = {{e^{2x} - 1 - e^{3x} + e^{ - x} } \over {e^{3x} - 2e^x + e^{ - x} }} \cr <br /> e^{3x} - 2e^x + e^{ - x} = e^{2x} - 1 - e^{3x} + e^{ - x} \cr <br /> e^{3x} - 2e^x = e^{2x} - 1 - e^{3x} \cr <br /> 2e^{3x} - e^{2x} - 2e^x = 1 \cr}
 
Your mistake's in your last line!
e^{3x} - 2e^x = e^{2x} - 1 - e^{3x} \Rightarrow 2e^{3x}- e^{2x} - 2e^x=-1, so then the equation you want to solve, letting u=e^x, is 2u^3-u^2-2u+1=0, which does have nice solutions!
 
cristo said:
Your mistake's in your last line!
e^{3x} - 2e^x = e^{2x} - 1 - e^{3x} \Rightarrow 2e^{3x}- e^{2x} - 2e^x=-1, so then the equation you want to solve, letting u=e^x, is 2u^3-u^2-2u+1=0, which does have nice solutions!

Indeed, that solved it. Thank you.

I have one more question to ask:

I need to show that:

{\mathop{\rm Artanh}\nolimits} \left( {{\mathop{\rm Sin}\nolimits} \left( {{\textstyle{\pi \over 4}}} \right)} \right) = {\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {1 + \sqrt 2 } \right)

Here's my working so far, I don't know where to go from the bottom line:

$\displaylines{<br /> {\mathop{\rm Artanh}\nolimits} \left( x \right) = {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {{{x + 1} \over {x - 1}}} \right) \cr <br /> {\mathop{\rm Sin}\nolimits} \left( {{\textstyle{\pi \over 4}}} \right) = {\textstyle{1 \over {\sqrt 2 }}} \cr <br /> {\mathop{\rm Artanh}\nolimits} \left( {{\mathop{\rm Sin}\nolimits} \left( {{\textstyle{\pi \over 4}}} \right)} \right) = {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {{{1 + {\textstyle{1 \over {\sqrt 2 }}}} \over {1 - {\textstyle{1 \over {\sqrt 2 }}}}}} \right) \cr <br /> = {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {{{{{\sqrt 2 + 1} \over {\sqrt 2 }}} \over {{{\sqrt 2 - 1} \over {\sqrt 2 }}}}} \right) = {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {{{\left( {\sqrt 2 + 1} \right)\sqrt 2 } \over {\left( {\sqrt 2 - 1} \right)\sqrt 2 }}} \right) \cr <br /> = {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {{{\sqrt 2 + 1} \over {\sqrt 2 - 1}}} \right) \cr <br /> {{\sqrt 2 + 1} \over {\sqrt 2 - 1}} = {{\sqrt 2 + 1} \over {\sqrt 2 - 1}} \times {{1 + \sqrt 2 } \over {1 + \sqrt 2 }} \cr <br /> = {{3 + 2\sqrt 2 } \over 1} = 3 + 2\sqrt 2 \cr <br /> {\mathop{\rm Artanh}\nolimits} \left( {{\mathop{\rm Sin}\nolimits} \left( {{\textstyle{\pi \over 4}}} \right)} \right) = {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {3 + 2\sqrt 2 } \right) \cr <br /> = {\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {\sqrt {3 + 2\sqrt 2 } } \right) \cr <br /> = \cr} $<br /> <br />
 
Last edited:
  • #10
W3bbo said:
The original question was "Find x, using the definitions of the hyperbolics in terms of exponentials"
WOW, way to leave that out. Next time you ask for help, make sure you post the whole question.
 
  • #11
for your second question, you only need to show that
\sqrt {3 + 2\sqrt 2 } =1+\sqrt2<br />
and indeed:
\sqrt {3 + 2\sqrt 2 }=\sqrt {1 + 2\sqrt 2 + 2 }=\sqrt {1^2 + 2\sqrt2 + (\sqrt2)^2 }=\sqrt {(1+\sqrt2)^2}=1+\sqrt2
 
  • #12
Kurret said:
for your second question, you only need to show that
\sqrt {3 + 2\sqrt 2 } =1+\sqrt2<br />
and indeed:
\sqrt {3 + 2\sqrt 2 }=\sqrt {1 + 2\sqrt 2 + 2 }=\sqrt {1^2 + 2\sqrt2 + (\sqrt2)^2 }=\sqrt {(1+\sqrt2)^2}=1+\sqrt2

Whoa, that's voodoo. How did you figure that out?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K