4 Charges at the corners of a square

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ortix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Square
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at the center of a square with charges placed at its corners. The charges are +4 µC at (0,0) and (1,1), +3 µC at (1,0), and -3 µC at (0,1). The user initially calculated the electric fields from each charge but misapplied the vector addition method. The correct approach involves recognizing that the two +4 µC charges produce fields that cancel each other, allowing for a simpler calculation of the resultant electric field, which is confirmed to be approximately 107900 N/C, or 1.1E5 N/C.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with vector addition of forces
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically cosine
  • Basic proficiency in physics equations related to electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector addition in electric fields to improve accuracy in calculations
  • Learn about the superposition principle in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their representation
  • Review the effects of charge placement on electric field strength and direction
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics enthusiasts, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and charge interactions.

Ortix
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a square which is 1m on a side. Charges are placed at the corners of the square as follows:

+4 uC at (0,0)
+4 uC at (1,1)
+3 uC at (1,0)
-3 uC at (0,1)

What is the magnitude of the electric field at the square's center?

Homework Equations



E= k(Q/r^2)

(sorry i suck at latex, don't know how to use it)

The Attempt at a Solution



Well I thought this was fairly simple. I just plugged in Q and for r^2 i used cos(45)^2 since the the distance to the center is 1cos(45) = sqrt(2)/2

This gave me 3 different values. for the 4 uC's i got 71934.4 N/C, for the +3 i got 53950.8 and for the -3 i got -53950.8.

So these are the fields in their respective direction. To calculate the magnitude I sum them all, square them and then take the square root. That gives me 143868. However this is not one of the answers:

1.1E5
1.3E5
1.5E5
1.7E5

Anyone have any idea if i did something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you show please the direction of the individual field vectors?

ehild
 
[PLAIN]http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/1600/unledss.jpg

I hope this is right

1 2 and 4 are positive whereas 3 is negative
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is right. What can you say about the field of the two 4μC charges? What is the direction of the resultant?

ehild
 
Well it should cancel right? Since they are the same magnitude and opposite direction. So would i just sum field's 3 and 2, square them and then take the square root?
 
Well, you add only those two fields. You know their magnitudes, don't you? and they point in the same direction, so what is the magnitude of their sum? Why do you square and take the square root?

ehild
 
The reason why i square and take the square root is because my book says so :P But i realized that I already know the magnitude and direction (in the book it was calculated separately) so I just need to add them which gives me 107900. Is that correct? Would the answer be 1.1E5?
 
Ortix said:
The reason why i square and take the square root is because my book says so :P But i realized that I already know the magnitude and direction (in the book it was calculated separately) so I just need to add them which gives me 107900. Is that correct? Would the answer be 1.1E5?


Yes. :smile:

ehild
 
sweet! Thanks man :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
997
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K