MHB 57^(th) digit in decimal expansion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the 57th digit in the decimal expansion of 1/57. It highlights the use of modular arithmetic and Euler's phi function to determine the period of the decimal expansion. By finding the period, one can compute earlier digits in the sequence, simplifying the process. The approach emphasizes efficiency in calculating specific digits without needing to compute the entire decimal expansion. Understanding these mathematical tools is crucial for accurately determining the desired digit.
juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
Calculation of $57^{th}$ digit in the decimal expansion of $\displaystyle \frac{1}{57}$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
jacks said:
Calculation of $57^{th}$ digit in the decimal expansion of $\displaystyle \frac{1}{57}$

If you are allowed mod calculation and Euler's phi function, you can use >>this<<.
It gives you the period of the decimal expansion, meaning it suffices to calculate a decimal that comes much earlier in the expansion.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top