I 64% n.th + COP4 = more heat out of fuel than its calorific value?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter cmb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fuel Heat Value
AI Thread Summary
A CCGT generating power at 64% efficiency combined with a COP4 heat pump suggests a theoretical output of 256% thermal energy from the fuel's calorific value, raising questions about the source of the extra heat. The discussion highlights that while this seems counterintuitive, it is explained by the heat pump's ability to transfer environmental heat, not create energy. The concept of Coefficient of Performance (COP) is clarified as a measure of efficiency that can exceed 100%, which does not violate thermodynamic laws. The conversation also explores the potential for directly harnessing combustion temperatures to capture additional heat without electrical generation. Overall, the principles of energy transfer and thermodynamics are central to understanding these efficiencies.
cmb
Messages
1,128
Reaction score
128
TL;DR Summary
If a CCGT generates electrical power at 64% efficiency, and a heat pump generates 4 times the thermal power to electrical power, is that more heat energy out than the fuel has?
Something that has been on my mind a while.

If a CCGT generates electrical power at 64% efficiency, and a COP4 heat pump, powered by that generator, generates 4 times the thermal power to electrical power, wouldn't that mean we can get 256% heat out of the fuel's calorific value?

Maybe that is OK, but seems non-intuitive.

Where does the extra heat come from, or what am I not understanding?

I presume the answer is that because we're going from 'very hot' heat to colder heat, we can suck up some of the environmental heat? If so, is there not a more direct way to use the combustion temperature from a burning fuel to directly suck in extra heat from the environment, missing out the electrical generation bit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Short summary of @Llewelyn 's point: COP is like efficiency, but it is not efficiency. It is always way over 100%. That's not a violation of the laws of thermo. The energy isn't being created, just moved, and there are hard restrictions on the available temperature deltas.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top