90% done with this evenly dstrbtd chrg on infinite line problem. PLEASE help 10%

  • Thread starter Thread starter twisted079
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Line
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at the origin due to a continuous line of charge extending from x=+x0 to positive infinity, with a uniform linear charge density λ0. The key equations used include dE = (kedq) / r² and dq = λ0 dx. The correct approach involves integrating from x0 to infinity, leading to the expression E = keλ(-1/x0) for the electric field's magnitude, with the direction being along the negative x-axis. Participants clarified the use of λ0 instead of Q/L and confirmed that constants like ke and λ0 can be factored out during integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of electrostatics, particularly Coulomb's law
  • Concept of linear charge density (λ0)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn advanced integration techniques, particularly improper integrals
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their implications in electrostatics
  • Investigate the effects of varying charge densities on electric field calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as anyone involved in solving problems related to electric fields and charge distributions.

twisted079
Messages
25
Reaction score
1
90% done with this "evenly dstrbtd chrg on infinite line" problem. PLEASE help 10%

Homework Statement


A continuous line of charge lies along the x-axis, extending from x=+x0 to positive infinity. The line carries positive charge with a uniform linear charge density λ0.
What is the magnitude of the electric field at the origin? (Use λ0, x0 and ke as necessary.)



Homework Equations



1) dE = (kedq) / r2
2) dq = λdx = (Q/L)dx

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the prior equations to set up: dE = (keQ / L) * dx/x2
Now time to integrate, but first a few questions. I understand "L" is the length of the entire rod? But so is x? Am I using L and x the right way or should I put everything in terms of x? Second, what are the constants that I pull out of the integral? Since its to infinity, doesn't "L" (or x?) change, meaning I can't pull out the L? I understand ke and Q are constant so I pull them out, is that all? Also I am integrating from 0 to infinity correct? Depending on what the set integral is, I understand that there is a possibility that when I integrate, infinity might be a denominator, making that part go to 0? I am kind of confused, any help would be GREATLY appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


x is not the length. It's just a general position along the x-axis.

You don't need L. The answer should have λ0 in it dq = λ0 dx .

You're about 50% done, at best.
 
Last edited:


But λ = Q/L, or in this case would it be Q/x?

Edit: What about the constants that I could pull out of the integral?
 


Ok, so this is my idea of what the solution would look like:

(keQ) / L 0infinity dx/x2

---> 1/x2 dx becomes -(1/x) which puzzles me because this leads to no solution except keQ/L (L or x) ... Please help!
 


Maybe I wasn't clear. Wherever you have Q/L, use λ0 instead.

If you had such a line of charge, then if you cut a length, L, of that line and measured the amount of charge, Q, for that length, L, you would find the ratio of charge to length to be λ0 .

In other words, Q/L = λ0 , anywhere on the line.
 


Here is what I have come up with so far:

dq = λdx
dE = keλdx / x2
E = keλ 0 dx/x2
E = keλ(-1/x) from 0 to ∞

Now, when I plus 0 in, I run into a problem
 


The integral should go from x0 to ∞ .
 


So I would have

E = keλ(-1/x0 - 0) --> -(keλ / x0) ?
 


Yes, Except you're finding the magnitude. Drop the "-" sign .

I edited this post, but you must have seen it before I made the changes.
 
  • #10


Ah okay, and the direction would be in the negative x-axis. Thank you so much for your help!
 
  • #11


twisted079 said:
Ah okay, and the direction would be in the negative x-axis. Thank you so much for your help!
Yes. Your previous answer is almost correct.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
64
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K