I A and ϕ inside a Faraday cage?

Click For Summary
Inside a Faraday cage, the vector potential A and scalar potential ϕ are not necessarily zero, as their values depend on the chosen gauge. The discussion emphasizes that potentials are subject to gauge transformations, making their specific values less meaningful without specifying the gauge. When the electromagnetic field is zero, the potentials can still be expressed in terms of an arbitrary scalar field χ. The key takeaway is that while the electromagnetic fields E and B are gauge-invariant and observable, the potentials A and ϕ do not have a unique physical interpretation. Thus, the design of a Faraday cage cannot guarantee A=0 and ϕ=0 without further context.
cuallito
Messages
94
Reaction score
1
Are A and ϕ always zero inside a Faraday cage, like E and B are?

If not, can its design be modified to accomplish that? If not, is there an analogous mechanism that'd always have A=0 and ϕ=0 inside?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Same answer as your other thread. The potentials are only physical up to gauge transformations. It therefore makes little sense to talk about the value of the potentials (unless you fully specify the gauge fixing).
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Vanadium 50
If the em. field is zero somewhere, i.e., ##\vec{E}=\vec{B}=0##, then ##\Phi=\partial_t \chi/c## and ##vec{A}=-\vec{\nabla} \chi## for an arbitrary scalar field ##\chi##. The gauge potentials are not uniquely defined by the equations of motion describing a physical situation. That's, because Maxwell's electrodynamics is a gauge theory. The potentials do not have a specific physical meaning but the observable electromagnetic field ##\vec{E}=-\partial_t \vec{A}/c - \vec{\nabla} \chi##, ##\vec{B}=\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A}##, which is a gauge-invariant quantity, has.
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
10K
Replies
8
Views
4K