A book that covers all the math a physicist will ever need?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion emphasizes that there is no single book that encompasses all the mathematics required by theoretical physicists due to the diverse mathematical needs across different fields. Recommended texts include "Mathematical Methods for Physicists" by George B. Arfken and Hans J. Weber (Boas) and "Advanced Engineering Mathematics" by Erwin Kreyszig. Essential mathematical topics for theoretical physicists include vector and linear algebra, tensor algebra, vector calculus, functional analysis, probability theory, and differential geometry. The focus should be on understanding how to apply mathematical concepts relevant to specific research areas in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Mastery of calculus
  • Understanding of vector and linear algebra
  • Familiarity with tensor algebra and calculus
  • Basic knowledge of functional analysis and probability theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study "Mathematical Methods for Physicists" by Boas
  • Explore "Advanced Engineering Mathematics" by Kreyszig
  • Learn about differential geometry for applications in General Relativity
  • Research practical statistics for experimental physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, students in physics, and researchers looking to enhance their mathematical skills for various physics applications.

Kalvino
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
What is a good book, after mastering calculus, that covers all the mathematics a theoretical physicist will ever need?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed, usually when starting some new project, you realize that there still is some math you don't know. That's research! It's important to have the standard repository of mathematical skills. As a theorist I'd say the following topics should be covered: vector/linear algebra, tensor algebra, vector (+tensor) calculus, analysis, elements of functional analysis (theory of distributions), probability theory, the Hilbert space, elementary Lie-group and -algebra theory including representation theory on Hilbert space.

From this basis you can learn any special math topic pretty easily when needed. So it's more impotant to learn the way (applied) mathematicians express their results and how to make them useful for your own research in physics than to just try to learn "all the math a physicist will ever need". E.g., an experimental physicist will need a lot of practical statistics for analyzing the results of his or her measurements, while a theorist interested in General Relativity will need a lot of differential geometry, which is (almost) useless for an experimentalist and vice versa.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K