I A busy and interesting night sky in Mackinaw City

AI Thread Summary
A recent visit to Mackinaw City, Michigan, led to intriguing observations of the night sky, including an unusual object resembling a faint banner that moved differently than an airplane and emitted no sound. Witnesses, including the original poster, reported seeing a bright flash of light that appeared stationary, as well as a pair of objects moving together in a shooting star-like manner. The sightings sparked discussions about potential explanations, ranging from drones to UFOs, highlighting the difficulty in identifying such phenomena. The poster provided rough illustrations to convey their experiences but acknowledged the challenge in accurately recalling the details. The observations remain a mystery, emphasizing the complexity of interpreting unexplained aerial events.
Kwantumnaut
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
A few events I saw that appeared different and like I've never heard of before.
Hello there, first let me say I hope this is the right section for this topic, and if not please feel free to move it!

So a couple days ago I took a trip up to Mackinaw City, Michigan, and saw a few interesting and intriguing things (luckily!) in the sky that night, and was just hoping maybe somebody could help explain and identify what it possibly was that I saw.

So the first one, ( which oddly enough turns out I wasn't the only one who saw it, and people hundreds of miles away I saw later on Facebook reported seeing something similar around the same time) was right as I was arriving and getting ready to get off the highway exit. I looked out my window and saw what looked like maybe I initially assumed was just possibly a small plane flying a banner behind it, but something about it just felt and appeared different, so I stopped to look better, and it definitely wasn't an airplane 1. Because it was dark and late at night and it was too feint to even read the banner if it was one, and it looked more like a solid color not like there was any writing or anything like on a banner, 2. It really didn't move like an airplane, path or velocity-wise, 3. It had no lights and just looked like a feint banner (or rectangularish) shaped object (again with nothing visibly in front of it like an airplane) that just felt like it's movement was a little... off to be an airplane, and 4. It made no noise, and if it was an airplane close enough for the banner to be that visible it would've been at least somewhat faintly audible. I only observed it for maybe 20-25 seconds or so until it was considerably far away and just decided to continue driving.

The second one I'm sure maybe wasn't really what I thought I saw or hoped since it happened so fast, but when I was at the Dark Sky Park nearby, I was looking not completely above me but like maybe halfway between the horizon and directly above me, and I saw a very bright, isolated flash of light a little above the tree line. Like I said it happened so fast, and it was sort of more out of my peripheral vision, so I definitely didn't get a good look at it, but it didn't move like a shooting star, and just appeared like a very bright stationary shooting star I guess.

I edited up and made a very rough image of just what I can remember seeing for both of these, but it's pretty much the rough idea of about what it looked like. The first one is of course the object in the top of the image, and the second is the 3 lights above the tree line, which shows the development of the flash in about maybe 1 second (Ignore the airplane contrail going towards the moon):

IMG-20220422-043929098-2-2-2.png


And the other interesting observation I saw that night, was as I was looking up at the stars, I noticed out of the blue what looked like a shooting star appear for the first like split-second, but it had another one moving along with it. It sort of had the characteristics/feel of how a shooting star would be, except like I said it was almost like it was paired with another, it started straight for the first couple seconds or so then followed a somewhat curved path, or like they were attached and orbiting around a common barrycenter, and it lasted for maybe roughly 7~10 seconds before disappearing. There were also no clouds, so there were no clouds for it to appear out of and go behind, it was all clear sky and it appeared and disappeared similar to a shooting star, only a little slower/longer lasting.

Again, here is a rough illustration of what I remember it looking like. The dipper/other stars were from an actual original picture that night, I just used it as a reference for what it looked like from my POV and compared with the other stars. The feint yellowish lines are about what I remember the trajectory looking like, and again that was maybe for 7 or so seconds.

IMG-20220421-225159576.png


Hopefully my explanations and (poor, I know!) edited illustrations are accurate for what I saw, unfortunately I can't really 100% recall visually mainly what the first one looked like, but they are pretty close.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There's no telling what these might be. People have confused balloons, drones, planes, satellites, floating paper lanterns, and a thousand other things for UFO's, meteors, or other phenomenon. There's almost no way to know.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top