A Case For an Indeterministic Universe

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Royce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of an indeterministic universe, exploring definitions of determinism and indeterminism, and examining implications in cosmology, quantum physics, and the theory of evolution. Participants engage with philosophical questions about chance, causality, and the nature of free will.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that determinism relies on cause and effect, suggesting that if chance events exist, the universe cannot be entirely deterministic.
  • Others propose that the early universe's formation involved random chance, particularly during the Big Bang and subsequent inflation, leading to the current structure of galaxies.
  • There is a discussion on Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, with some asserting it indicates true indeterminacy at the quantum level, while others argue it reflects limitations in measurement rather than a lack of definite states.
  • Some participants challenge the notion that chance mutations in evolution imply indeterminism, suggesting there may be systematic processes underlying these mutations.
  • One participant introduces the idea that intelligence may influence outcomes in ways that cannot be predicted, implying a potential for free will.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of chance and determinism, with no consensus reached on whether the universe is fundamentally indeterministic or if apparent randomness can be explained through underlying processes.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in defining causality and chance, particularly in the context of quantum mechanics and evolutionary theory, but do not resolve these complexities.

  • #31
1+1=only1 said:
(Conjecture) If the universe is completely deterministic, there could be no beginning of the universe, because, before the universe existed, there was no matter, no energy, no space, no time. No time... Cause and effect is based on the arrow of time. If there were no time to support cause & effect, then there could be no effect of the universe coming into existence, because there could never be a cause to support that effect. Therefore, the very beginning of the universe was at least ONE example of an effect without a cause, and so since there has been at least one effect without cause in this universe, the universe MUST be indeterministic !
Your error is in assuming that the absence of matter, energy, space and time prior to the Big Bang also means that the universe was necessarily uncaused. We have no idea what implications the Big Bang singularity has for our understanding of physics, but we can be sure that the notion of space and time lose their usual meaning at that singularity. The absence of a known cause does not prove the absence of a cause (“absence of proof is not the same as proof of absence”)

MF
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K