A compact => d(x, A) = d(x, a) for some a in A

  • Thread starter Thread starter radou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compact
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the property of compact subsets in metric spaces, specifically that for a non-empty compact subset A of a metric space (X, d), there exists an element a in A such that the distance from a point x in X to A, denoted as d(x, A), equals d(x, a). The proof utilizes the continuity of the metric d and the extreme value theorem, confirming that the infimum of distances from x to elements of A is achieved at some point b in A. This establishes the existence of a minimum distance in compact metric spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of compactness in topology
  • Knowledge of continuity in mathematical functions
  • Basic understanding of the extreme value theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of compact sets in topology
  • Learn about the extreme value theorem and its applications
  • Explore continuity in metric spaces and its implications
  • Investigate examples of metric spaces and their compact subsets
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying topology, and anyone interested in the properties of metric spaces and compactness.

radou
Homework Helper
Messages
3,149
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



The title pretty much suggests everything.

Let (X, d) be a metric space, and A a non empty compact subset of X.

If A is compact, then there exists some a in A such that d(x, A) = d(x, a), where d(x, A) = inf{d(x, a) : a is in A}, i.e. the set {d(x, a) : a in A} has a least element.

The Attempt at a Solution



Let x be a fixed point of X. Define the mapping d' : {x} x A -->R with d(x, a). Since the metric d : X x X --> R is continuous, so is d'. Since {x} and A are compact, so is {x} x A, and we can apply the extreme value theorem to d'. So, there exist points x1 = (x, b) and x2 = (x, c) such that d'(x1) <= d'(a) <= d'(x2), for any a in A, i.e. d(x, b) <= d(x, a) <= d(x, c), so for any a in {x} x A, we have d(x, b) <= d(x, a), for any a in A. Hence, b is the element of A we were looking for.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is entirely correct imho.
 
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K