A concept from calculus that has always bothered me

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ronaldor9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Concept
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
ronaldor9
Messages
91
Reaction score
1
When one writes [tex]\int p(t) \, dt[/tex] is the constant of integration implied? I have always thought that it wasn't necessary to write [tex]\int p(t) \, dt +k[/tex]. However, in my diff. eq. book the constant is ussually written out, why is this so?

In addition the book also writes [tex]\int_{t_o}^t p(t) \, dt +k[/tex] isn't the constant here unnecessary since we now have the limits of integration included?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's usually written because it's definite.

Suppose

[tex] y ' = f(x, y(x)) \ , y(x_0) = y_0[/tex]

It does seem logical to say that (assuming f is integratable)

[tex] \int y' dx = \int f(x,y(x)) dx \rightarrow y = \int f(x,y(x)) dx + k[/tex]

but since we have initial conditions, we can do better.

[tex] <br /> \int_{x_0}^{x} y'(t) dt = \int_{x_0}^{x} f(t,y(t)) dt \rightarrow y - y_0 = \int_{x_0}^{x} f(t,y(t)) dt[/tex]
Thus,
[tex] y = \int_{x_0}^{x} f(t,y(t)) dt + y_0[/tex]

Better?
 
Last edited:
Thanks l'Hopital
Why is the later form preferred over the first form?
 
Simply because it actually involves the initial conditions.
 
There is one part in my book where it writes [tex]R'(y)=Q(x_0,y)[/tex]
and then by integration [tex]R(y)=\int_{y_0}^y Q(x_0,y)\,dy[/tex].

Shouldn't theauthor here have included a constant at the end of the integral as you have written in you example?
 
ronaldor9 said:
There is one part in my book where it writes [tex]R'(y)=Q(x_0,y)[/tex]
and then by integration [tex]R(y)=\int_{y_0}^y Q(x_0,y)\,dy[/tex].

Shouldn't theauthor here have included a constant at the end of the integral as you have written in you example?
Yes, because with that notation R(y0)= 0 which is not true for all anti-derivatives. I would also object to using "y" both as a limit of integration (and so outside the integral) and as the variable of integration. Much better would be either
[tex]R(y)= \int_{y_0}^y Q(x_0,t)dt+ C[/tex]
or
[tex]R(y)= \int^y Q(x_0, t)dt[/tex]
where we don't need the "C" because the lower limit of integration is left open.

If you write just
[tex]R(y)= \int Q(x_0,y)dy[/tex]
the usual notation for the "anti-derivative", the constant C is implied. You do not write it there. Of course, if you wrote
[tex]R(y)= \int y^2 dy= \frac{1}{3}y^2+ C[/tex]
The constant on the right is necessary.