A Conceptual doubt in a problem on Wien's Law

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to Wien's Law, specifically concerning the interpretation of a given wavelength of 700 nm and its implications for determining temperature. Participants are exploring the relationship between peak wavelength and temperature in the context of thermal radiation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning whether the specified wavelength should be treated as a peak wavelength and how that affects the calculated temperature. There is discussion about the implications of the temperature being above or below a certain threshold based on physical properties of materials, such as iron.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants suggest that the presence of temperature ranges in the answers indicates that a straightforward application of Wien's Law may not suffice. Others are reflecting on the implications of the wavelength in relation to the physical state of iron.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the ambiguity in the problem statement and the potential for multiple interpretations regarding the relationship between wavelength, temperature, and the physical state of materials. There is mention of the need to consider additional factors beyond just applying the equation.

warhammer
Messages
164
Reaction score
33
Homework Statement
A blacksmith puts an iron rod in a furnace and takes it out when it starts glowing red. Assume the wavelength of the red light emitted by the rod to be 700 nm. The temperature of the rod should be (Wien’s constant = 2.898 x 10-3 m.K):
(a) 4140 K
(b) <4140 K
(c) >4140 K
(d) In the range 4140 K-4240 K
Relevant Equations
Wien's Displacement Law- λT=2.898*10^-3
Given λ=700nm, we use the equation mentioned above and find the Temperature to be 4140K. However, my doubt is that the wavelength specified to be used above is a maximum and I'm not sure if the answer is (a) or (d) considering that the latter is a range of the temperature.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
warhammer said:
However, my doubt is that the wavelength specified to be used above is a maximum
You are to use the given wavelength as the peak wavelength. Wien's law will then give you the temperature.
 
Doc Al said:
You are to use the given wavelength as the peak wavelength.
I'm not sure that this is correct. It's not compatible with how I interpret "takes it out when it starts glowing red."
 
DrClaude said:
I'm not sure that this is correct. It's not compatible with how I interpret "takes it out when it starts glowing red."
You may be right. I found the statement rather vague, so I interpreted it to mean that the peak wavelength was what was meant.
 
Doc Al said:
You may be right. I found the statement rather vague, so I interpreted it to mean that the peak wavelength was what was meant.
I think that the presence of lower/upper bounds in the possible answers is another clue that plugging the wavelength in Wien's displacement law is not sufficient.
 
DrClaude said:
I think that the presence of lower/upper bounds in the possible answers is another clue that plugging the wavelength in Wien's displacement law is not sufficient.
I thought the opposite. What information is available to give a range of temperatures? Also answers c and d would overlap.
 
Doc Al said:
I thought the opposite. What information is available to give a range of temperatures? Also answers c and d would overlap.
I'll explain later, after @warhammer has had time to work the problem.

I think you have to think about all that is happening, not just plug-and-play with the equation.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: warhammer and Doc Al
DrClaude said:
I think you have to think about all that is happening, not just plug-and-play with the equation.
On further thought, I'd say you are correct. Thanks!
 
@DrClaude @Doc Al Apologies for the late response. I seemed to figure it out. The temperature should be less than 4140K (Option b) because logically thinking the iron wouldn't be in its current solid form if the temp were really that high! (and this is a fairly regular job for the blacksmiths). If we use Wien's Law, the wavelength is supposed to be maximum and the energy is supposed to be maximum as well. Seeing red color doesn't imply that the energy per unit area peak is somewhere around the specified wavelength per se the Planck's Blackbody distribution law. Thus the temperature is supposed to be less than 4140K.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
  • #10
warhammer said:
The temperature should be less than 4140K (Option b) because logically thinking the iron wouldn't be in its current solid form if the temp were really that high!
You should be able to answer the question without knowing the melting point of the material being heated.

warhammer said:
Seeing red color doesn't imply that the energy per unit area peak is somewhere around the specified wavelength per se the Planck's Blackbody distribution law. Thus the temperature is supposed to be less than 4140K.
That's it. If the iron is just starting to glow at 700 nm, then the peak wavelength must still be in the infra-red, so T < 4140 K.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: warhammer and Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K