A confusion related to Significant figures

  • Thread starter babita
  • Start date
  • #1
61
0
A book says," 0.00052 has two significant figures: 5 and 2"

Now imagine a scale to measure length and suppose it's least count is 0.00005
we measure a length and it comes out to be 0.00052 where we are uncertain about the last digit. So if i am understanding the meaning of sig. figures right, shouldn't the no of significant figure be 5 ??
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
SammyS
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
11,398
1,045
A book says," 0.00052 has two significant figures: 5 and 2"

Now imagine a scale to measure length and suppose it's least count is 0.00005
we measure a length and it comes out to be 0.00052 where we are uncertain about the last digit. So if i am understanding the meaning of sig. figures right, shouldn't the no of significant figure be 5 ??
No.

You're not at all certain of the 2. You're pretty certain of the 5.

Leading zeros don't count as sig. fig.s .
 
  • #3
61
0
i know the rules..but i am trying to understand how they make sense
and i've nt got your point :(
 
  • #4
PhanthomJay
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
7,171
509
Supposing you multiply 1734.6 by 0.0001. The answer, which is based on the least number of sig figs in the given values, is 0.2. It is not 0.1735. Why? Well, 0.0001 could actually be say 0.00014, in which case the answer is 0.24284. That's hardly 0.1735. So .0001 has just 1 sig fig, which is why the rule makes sense.
 
  • #5
10
0
A book says," 0.00052 has two significant figures: 5 and 2"

Now imagine a scale to measure length and suppose it's least count is 0.00005
we measure a length and it comes out to be 0.00052 where we are uncertain about the last digit. So if i am understanding the meaning of sig. figures right, shouldn't the no of significant figure be 5 ??

significant digits are mostly non-zero digits.

best way to tell how many sig. figs. a number has is to convert it to scientific notation. (DO NOT ROUND OFF)..

56800 -> 5.68 x 10 ^ 4 5 6 8 three sig figs.

0.00052 ->5.2 x 10 ^ -4 5 2 two sig figs.

1000.001 -> 1.000001 x 10 ^ 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 seven sig figs.
 

Related Threads on A confusion related to Significant figures

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
958
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
210
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
682
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
626
Top