A Course in Calculus and Real Analysis by Sudhir R. Ghorpade

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around a new mathematics book that has received positive reviews, with links provided for further reading. Participants are encouraged to share their own reviews and recommendations if they have used the book. The book is noted for its terse style, which may make it more suitable as a reference rather than a primary learning resource, drawing comparisons to other texts like Rudin and Spivak. One contributor mentions their experience with the first edition of Spivak, noting that while the problems were challenging and left them feeling overwhelmed, the book could be enjoyable for the right audience.
Physics news on Phys.org
This book looks VERY terse. Books that are this terse are best regarded as references rather than books to learn from. I include Rudin in this. Spivak is less terse, it is a better book.

I have only read the first edition of Spivak and for me, the problems were a little too difficult and left me feeling beat up after solving them. But for the right reader, it would be a highly enjoyable read for sure.
 
i am self learning physics. have you ever worked your way backwards again after finishing most undergrad courses? i have textbooks for junior/senior physics courses in classical mechanics, electrodynamics, thermal physics, quantum mechanics, and mathematical methods for self learning. i have the Halliday Resnick sophomore book. working backwards, i checked out Conceptual Physics 11th edition by Hewitt and found this book very helpful. What i liked most was how stimulating the pictures...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
12K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K