A few questions about airflow and filters...

AI Thread Summary
Adding more filters increases the available surface area for airflow, which can reduce resistance, but the actual reduction depends on whether the flow is laminar or turbulent. In practical applications, such as comparing a single filter to a Corsi–Rosenthal Box with four filters, airflow improvements may be modest, indicating that resistance changes are not always proportional to surface area increases. Expensive workshop vacuums typically feature larger HEPA filters and wider hoses, contributing to enhanced airflow and vacuum efficiency. Wider hoses reduce resistance, allowing for greater air volume even if the speed is lower, particularly when narrowing occurs at the attachment point. Measuring airspeed with a wind speed meter can help approximate airflow volume, but results may vary based on system design and configurations.
SentinelAeon
Messages
31
Reaction score
3
Just a few quick questions regarding airflow, mostly in connection with motors creating the airflow, like pc fans, vacuum motor, air going into a car engine through air filter, etc.

1) Adding more filters increases the availably surface through which the air can flow, therefor reducing the resistance. Am i correct in that ? How would one get the appropriate reduction of the resistance by doubling the filter surface ? I know exact number depends on many aspects but just to get a broad idea, is the resistance halved or is the resistance reduced by a lot smaller amount ?

filters.png

2) To add to the previous question, the reason i am asking is because some data i saw regarding Corsi–Rosenthal Boxes. There was a comparison between just using 1 filter and fan attached directly to it and a Corsi–Rosenthal Box - here you have 4 usable filters. But when they compared the air speed flowing through the fan, it was only improved for about 20%, which doesn't sound much considering we increased the filter surface by 4. Could it be that they made an error and actualy measured the airflow going through the filter and since the surface is 4 times bigger that would mean a lot more cfm of air moved at the same air speed ?

3) Is this the reason why expensive workshop vacuums usualy have a bigger hepa filter (more surface) than cheap ones and why sports air filters usualy have more dense structure than cheap ones (more curves - more actual filter material), in the image below the cheap white has 15 curves while the more expensive one has 28 curves - a lot more actual filter material (path for air to go through) on the expensive filter.

car filters.jpg

4) Another thing i saw was that many of the more expensive workshop vacuums use wider hoses. That would mean that because they are wider, there is less resistance for air to travel through. And while the actual speed of air might be slower, due to a lot wider hose, the volume of air that travels through it per minute will be higher. Am i correct ?

5) What if we used a wider hose for less air resistance but at the end of that hose, there was a narrowing - an example of that could be a vacuum attachment. Does that mean that even though the hole in the attachment is the same for both cases (see image below), the fact that the hose itself is wider means the resistance would be smaller and airflow greater ?

vacuum.png

6) Would a wind speed meter be appropriate to compare such scenarios, more air speed means less resistance ? Could i also get aproximation of volume of air moved per minute by taking into account air speed and diameter of the exiting tube ?

Capture.JPG
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
SentinelAeon said:
1) Adding more filters increases the availably surface through which the air can flow, therefor reducing the resistance. Am i correct in that ?
Towards the end of the service interval, the pressure drop through a filter, partly blocked by collected particles, is more critical than the pressure drop through the clean material of a new filter.

A greater area, of parallel flow through filter material, increases the quantity of particulates that can be trapped, before the filter will need to be replaced.

Any analysis must assume the filter is at the end of the service period, in the worst case environment.
 
  • Like
Likes SentinelAeon
Baluncore said:
Towards the end of the service interval, the pressure drop through a filter, partly blocked by collected particles, is more critical than the pressure drop through the clean material of a new filter.

A greater area, of parallel flow through filter material, increases the quantity of particulates that can be trapped, before the filter will need to be replaced.

Any analysis must assume the filter is at the end of the service period, in the worst case environment.
we are ignoring particles. I am only interested in how filter affects airflow. So, does more surface reduces the resistance ?
 
SentinelAeon said:
So, does more surface reduces the resistance ?
... I'd say it's more about the increased cross section of having multiple openings rather than the surface area of the filters. But yeah, I think paralleling filters would allow more flow through for a given pressure differential.
 
SentinelAeon said:
1) Adding more filters increases the availably surface through which the air can flow, therefor reducing the resistance. Am i correct in that ?
Yes. If the flow through the filter is laminar, the resistance will be half at the same flow. If the flow is turbulent, the resistance will be less than half. Search terms to learn about the difference: laminar flow and turbulent flow.
SentinelAeon said:
There was a comparison between just using 1 filter and fan attached directly to it and a Corsi–Rosenthal Box - here you have 4 usable filters. But when they compared the air speed flowing through the fan, it was only improved for about 20%
Any system with air flow through it has a system curve (search the term). The resulting flow is the point where the system curve intersects the fan curve (search that term). Changing the resistance of one part of the system may or may not have a large effect on the total flow.
SentinelAeon said:
Is this the reason why expensive workshop vacuums usualy have a bigger hepa filter (more surface) than cheap ones
Hepa filters have more resistance than less effective filters. Also, larger filters hold more particulates. And this is a case where you get what you pay for.
SentinelAeon said:
4) Another thing i saw was that many of the more expensive workshop vacuums use wider hoses.
You pay more to get more "suck", or a combination of more air flow and more vacuum. The larger hoses move more material, and larger chunks. The combination of more air flow and more vacuum requires a more powerful motor and larger blower. Again, you get what you pay for.
SentinelAeon said:
Does that mean that even though the hole in the attachment is the same for both cases (see image below), the fact that the hose itself is wider means the resistance would be smaller and airflow greater ?
Probably. The exact answer depends on the size of the hole in the attachment, the diameter of the hose, the length of the hose, and some minor variables.
SentinelAeon said:
6) Would a wind speed meter be appropriate to compare such scenarios, more air speed means less resistance ? Could i also get aproximation of volume of air moved per minute by taking into account air speed and diameter of the exiting tube ?
Yes. This is a good way to measure air flow. Just be aware that the wind speed meter is measuring average velocity over the area of the turbine, and you are measuring a small diameter air flow. If you want compare the total air flow for different hoses and attachments, a good technique is to cut two holes in a sealed box. Insert the hose into one hole, seal around it with duct tape or something, and lay the wind speed meter over the other hole. The wind meter hole might be the same diameter as the wind meter turbine, or it could be larger. If the hole is larger, move the meter around to get an average velocity. Velocity times hole area equals flow.

Measuring air flow are good experiments for a curious person. You can also measure the fan curve by adding a water manometer (search that term) made from a piece of hardware store vinyl tubing and a ruler.
 
Basically everything you described is correct. The airflow increase is tough to predict because:

1. The resistance is probably linear vs airflow for filters, but usually it is quadratic vs obstructions.

2. The fan has an operating curve that you'd have to check to see how it's airflow varies with pressure. It may be flat or steep.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top