MHB A fundamental fact about Linear Algebra

Click For Summary
In the discussion, a proof is presented that a vector space \( V \) over an infinite field \( F \) cannot be expressed as a set-theoretic union of a finite number of proper subspaces. The proof assumes the contrary and uses the concept of linear combinations to show that the resulting set must be infinite, leading to a contradiction. The author emphasizes the importance of allowing sufficient time for responses, suggesting a week for participation. The conversation highlights the challenge of engaging others in mathematical discussions. Overall, the proof effectively demonstrates the fundamental property of vector spaces in linear algebra.
caffeinemachine
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
799
Reaction score
15
Hello MHB,
This is probably my first challenge problem which falls in the 'University Math' category.

$V$ is a vector space over an infinite field $F$, prove that $V$ cannot be written as a set theoretic union of a finite number of proper subspaces.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nobody participated :(

Here's my solution:

Assume contradictory to the problem. Let $n$ be the minimum integer such that $V$ can be written as $V=V_1\cup\cdots\cup V_n$ where each $V_i$ is a proper subspace of $V$. Thus, \begin{equation*}\forall i,\exists x_i\in V \text{ such that } x_i\in V_j\iff j=i\tag{1}\end{equation*}Now consider $S=\{f_1x_1+\cdots+f_nx_n:f_i\in F\}$. Clearly this set is infinite, thus, by PHP, there is a $k$ such that $a,b\in V_k$ for distinct $a$ and $b$ in $S$. This contradicts $(1)$. Hence we achieve the required contradiction and the proof is complete.
 
caffeinemachine said:
Nobody participated :(

I would give everyone at least a week to participate, since not everyone checks in on a daily basis. Some may only have time once a week.
 
MarkFL said:
I would give everyone at least a week to participate, since not everyone checks in on a daily basis. Some may only have time once a week.
My bad then. Next time I'll wait for a week.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
531
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K