A Health check App sensitive to asymptomatic COVID may be in the works

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a study published in Engineering in Medicine and Biology, which details an MIT algorithm designed to detect asymptomatic COVID-19 through cough recordings. The algorithm demonstrates a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 83.2%. However, concerns arise regarding the potential for false positives, particularly in larger populations, where the actual number of true cases may be significantly lower. The implications of widespread app usage and the necessity for additional testing are also highlighted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of artificial intelligence applications in healthcare
  • Familiarity with sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic testing
  • Knowledge of COVID-19 testing methodologies
  • Awareness of public health testing strategies and statistics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the MIT algorithm's methodology for cough analysis
  • Explore the implications of false positives in diagnostic testing
  • Investigate current COVID-19 testing rates in various countries
  • Learn about the integration of AI in mobile health applications
USEFUL FOR

Healthcare professionals, public health officials, researchers in artificial intelligence, and anyone interested in the development of diagnostic tools for COVID-19.

.Scott
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
3,895
Reaction score
1,945
TL;DR
Promising results from an algorithm that checks for asymptomatic COVID (and other conditions) based on the sound of a forced cough.
Biology news on Phys.org
.Scott said:
Summary:: Promising results from an algorithm that checks for asymptomatic COVID (and other conditions) based on the sound of a forced cough.

https://www.embs.org/ojemb/articles...igence-diagnosis-using-only-cough-recordings/

A study has been posted in Engineering in Medicine and Biology (article) that describes the methods and results from an MIT algorithm as applied to asymptomatic COVID-19. Per the article: "For asymptomatic subjects it achieves sensitivity of 100% with a specificity of 83.2%."

Here's a report on that article.
Wow, impressive. Two questions:

** Does it work if there is an N95 mask held between the patient and my cellphone?

** Is it available in the Google Store?

:smile:
 
100% just means their sample size was too small. But let's use that number:
For asymptomatic subjects it achieves sensitivity of 100% with a specificity of 83.2%.
If you have 100 people using that app you might have 0-5 (depending on the location) who actually have the disease, they will show up as positive, and you'll also get 17 who will show up as positive without having it. In other words: Most positive results will be false positives. If the whole population downloads that and tests itself twice per week then you'll want to re-test 5% of the population every day. UAE and Denmark are leading at testing 1% of their population every day at the moment, the US is testing 0.3%, France is testing 0.4%.
You could ask everyone to self-isolate for a week whenever they test positive, but people won't do that with a 17% risk to get a false positive result.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K