A High School Senior's Review of "A Brief History of Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter DR13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    History Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the value of reading "A Brief History of Time" by Stephen Hawking, particularly from the perspective of a high school senior interested in physics. Participants share their opinions on the book's accessibility, content depth, and recommend alternative readings.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the depth of Hawking's writing, suggesting it is more suited for a general audience rather than those with a serious interest in physics.
  • One participant recommends works by George Gamow and Richard Feynman as more engaging and substantive alternatives to Hawking's books.
  • Another participant mentions their calculus background and expresses a desire for a book that balances rigor with enjoyment, indicating they will consider Gamow and Feynman.
  • Some participants affirm the value of "A Brief History of Time," describing it as a classic and worth reading, while noting that it may become complex towards the end.
  • There is a discussion about the level of physics background needed to fully appreciate the book, with suggestions that high school physics knowledge would be beneficial.
  • One participant shares that they were able to understand many popular physics accounts without a strong mathematical background, suggesting that some readers might still grasp the book's concepts without extensive prior knowledge.
  • A suggestion is made to consider "A BriefER History of Time" as an updated version that might be more accessible.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the value of "A Brief History of Time." While some find it worthwhile and educational, others criticize its depth and recommend alternative authors. The discussion reflects a range of opinions on the book's accessibility and content.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with physics and mathematics, which influences their perspectives on the book's complexity and readability. There are also differing views on what constitutes a solid background in physics for understanding the material.

DR13
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Do you think that A Brief History of Time is a worthwhile read? I am a high school senior with an interest in physics
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't find The Universe in a Nutshell by Stephen Hawking enlightening at all, so I doubt A Brief History of Time is any better. I didn't even finish the book because of its lack of real content. So I'm not impressed by Hawking's writing, as it is very superficial. His books are more for the general public than someone actually interested in physics. You would be much better off reading everything by George Gamow and Richard Feynman. They are much more interesting and fun to read than Hawking, plus their texts contain oodles of substance. I would start off with Gamow.

I also recommend Understanding Physics by Isaac Asimov. This book requires no calculus and only high school math, but it contains a lot of interesting physics. It is very thick and comprehensive, so it will keep you busy. Gamow's books are fun because they are shorter. Plus, he writes so well that they are a quick read.
 
Just to give some more background I do know calculus (through multi variable) so I can handle a book that has some rigor to it. That being said, I do not want a book that is too dry or something that is more of a pain than enjoyment. Ill look into gamow and feynman.
 
Then you might give Feynman's lecture series a try if you're interested in physics. I've never read them, but it might be tough going at first if you don't know much physics. I really don't know though.

Either that or you can try out a vector calculus book to learn some very important math. I would recommend http://matrixeditions.com/UnifiedApproach4th.html" by John Hubbard. If you can make it through this book, you will be light years ahead of your fellow physics, math, or engineering majors if that's what you end up doing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Brief History of Time was one of my favourite books. Definitely worth it a read.
 
nicksauce said:
Brief History of Time was one of my favourite books. Definitely worth it a read.

+1. It's a book that everyone should have in his library. It has become a classic book not only for laymen but also for physicists.
 
I liked it, it taught me quite a lot, though I recommend a solid back ground studying physics. He gets serious fast, its starts simple enough, but I got lost in it near the end of it.
 
Rurounizakku said:
though I recommend a solid back ground studying physics. He gets serious fast, its starts simple enough, but I got lost in it near the end of it.

How solid of a background? Intro physics? More? I had always thought it was a book in laymen's terms...
 
DR13 said:
How solid of a background? Intro physics? More? I had always thought it was a book in laymen's terms...

Most likely high school physics would be a great help. Though with it was made to be readable in laymen's terms, its not that simple to understand. Especially if your looking to go into advanced topics. His arguments for things always make my head spin. Though you should also know some cosmology. The book is centered around a lot of their concepts.
 
  • #10
You'll be able to read every single popular account of physics without any mathematical background & understand most of them.

I've read so many before & understood most of them well, a few did get crazy for a while but it's bearable. Keep in mind this at a time when I had forgotten even how to add fractions :p so it's possible without a background in phys & math.

Btw, get a BriefER History of Time. It's just an updated version.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
19K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
9K