A Historical Look at Analytic Geometry

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Analytic geometry, significantly advanced by Pierre de Fermat and René Descartes in 17th century France, revolutionized mathematical thought. Fermat's Method of Adequality is particularly noteworthy for its modern approach, contrasting with Descartes' techniques. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding their works directly, alongside recommended readings such as Morris Kline's "Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, Vol. 1" and Carl Boyer's "A History of Mathematics". These texts provide foundational insights into the evolution of analytic geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermat's Method of Adequality
  • Familiarity with Descartes' geometric principles
  • Knowledge of the historical context of 17th century mathematics
  • Ability to analyze mathematical texts and concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, Vol. 1" by Morris Kline
  • Explore "A History of Mathematics" by Carl Boyer
  • Study primary texts by Pierre de Fermat and René Descartes
  • Research the impact of analytic geometry on modern mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, historians of mathematics, educators, and students interested in the development of analytic geometry and its foundational figures.

DeeAytch
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Analytic geometry has provided us with such profound tools for thinking that it is hard to imagine what thinking must have been like before we had such tools. Two particular developers of these tools are Pierre de Fermat and Renee Descartes in 17th century France.

I would like to compare the analytic geometry of these two mathematicians. Particularly, how Fermat's Method of Adequality relates to the work of Descartes. Also, how, if at all, they influenced each other.

Thoughts?

Thanks,
DeeAytch.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't feel comfortable giving you a detailed answer (the most I "know" is that I've heard that Fermat's thinking was more like the modern approach than Descartes'), but you may want to check out Morris Kline's Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, Vol. 1. I think Carl Boyer's A History of Mathematics is also good. Wikipedia itself may or may not be of much help, but the sources at the bottom are usually quite good.

Of course, the best way is to read Fermat and Descartes. I'd link you, but if it's not one of the first results of a google search, I don't know an easy way to read them. Maybe somebody more knowledgeable than I can help, but those are a start.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
646
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K