A little problem about mathmatical logic

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeremy22511
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around mathematical logic, specifically the concepts of biconditional and equivalence signs in logical statements. The original poster seeks clarification on the differences between these symbols and their implications in defining propositions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to differentiate between the biconditional sign and the equivalence sign, questioning if they convey the same meaning when defining propositions. Some participants affirm that they are effectively the same, while others explore the nuances in their usage.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging in a productive dialogue, with some providing insights that suggest the biconditional and equivalence signs can be treated similarly for practical purposes. However, there is an acknowledgment of minor differences that may exist in specific contexts.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential variations in definitions based on different sources, indicating that the understanding of these symbols may depend on the specific context or framework being used.

jeremy22511
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. Is there any difference between the following 2 signs?
<=> (for biconditional) and 三(the equivalence sign)
2. When we say 'P is defined as Q), do we mean P三Q?


Thanks

J

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


It seems that for 2 propositions, P & Q:
(i) P三Q when 'P and Q have the same kinds and numbers of components' and 'their truth values are equivalent'
(ii) P <=> Q is expressing the same thing as above.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
please help...
 
Yes, the "biconditional" and "equivalence" are the same thing. And if "A" is defined as being "B", then A and B are equivalent.
 
For practical purposes, yes, they are effectively the same. The situation is similar to the four symbols [itex]\rightarrow, \implies, \vdash, \models[/itex].

Any difference between them is in the minor details -- so unless you're studying those, you can treat them as essentially the same.

From your description, it sounds like:
  1. [itex]P \Leftrightarrow Q[/itex] is a proposition, formed by connecting the propositions P and Q with the binary symbol [itex]\Leftrightarrow[/itex]? Or maybe your source is using [itex]P \leftrightarrow Q[/itex] for that...
  2. [itex]P \equiv Q[/itex] is an assertion about the syntactic and semantic properties of the two propositions P and Q.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K