- #1

Ziek_4790

- 2

- 0

- TL;DR Summary
- basically am studying for my exam tomorrow and I got in uni late registration this semester so I can't really get how they solved this question, tried to see the Dr and I couldn't get an appointment or (meet him in general),so please if u can explain this for me I would be grateful, I did understand half of it after spending more than 2 hours on it and I cant figure out rest of the steps.

its just the 2nd question (The equivalence Rule) that I need help with.

1. Consider the statement S =[¬(p ->q)]V[¬(pVq)].

(a) Construct truth tables for S.

(b) Find a simpler expression that is logically equivalent to S.

(a) Construct truth tables for S.

(b) Find a simpler expression that is logically equivalent to S.