A magnetostatics problem of interest 2

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the uniformly magnetized cylinder of finite length, a significant problem in magnetostatics relevant for modeling permanent cylindrical magnets. Two methods for calculating the magnetic field, the magnetic pole method and the magnetic surface current method, yield identical results for the magnetic field vector ## \vec{B} ##. The magnetic pole method involves fictitious magnetic pole densities, while the surface current method uses surface current densities to derive the magnetic field. There is a consensus that both methods, despite their different approaches, provide the same magnetic field results, highlighting their mathematical elegance and physical implications. The conversation also emphasizes the importance of these concepts in upper-level undergraduate physics education.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
aclaret said:
nice! my em knowledge is from course in applied linear analysis, so i don't understand so much about physical principles of the problem. if i may, let me ask, does there exist physical significance of quantity ##j_{M}## ("magnetic current"...)? i think, look like just mathematical trick ;)
The magnetization ## M ## gives the number of microscopic/atomic current loops circulating per unit volume. When ## M ## is uniform, there is zero magnetic current density ## j_m ##. The ## j_m ## arises in a way that you can picture in two dimensions with a chess or checkerboard, where each square has a current loop circulating counterclockwise on its outer perimeter. The currents in adjacent squares precisely cancel, and the net effect is a current circulating on the outside of the board. That is basically what the magnetic current density ##j_m ## or magnetic surface current per unit length ## K_m ## is all about. ## j_m=\nabla \times M/\mu_o ##, and ## K_m=M \times \hat{n}/\mu_o ##, basically a ## j_m ## with Stokes theorem applied at the surface boundary.
 
  • Informative
Likes aclaret
Back
Top